What’s a little extra 5 or 10 mph on the clock?

    • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That’s not a bad strategy. Driving slowly on slow roads or in adverse conditions and fast on highways seems rational to me. What is the point of making a road that is specifically designed for high speed and then putting a limit on it? The speed limit is an incredibly blunt instrument for deterring bad driving, as if driving below the limit is always going to be the safest option. It also motivates law enforcement abuse. The vehicle-environment-driver complex is much more nuanced than a single variable threshold.

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        What is the point of making a road that is specifically designed for high speed and then putting a limit on it?

        Because once you get within an hour and a half of a major city, you’ve got hundreds of suburbs feeding into it with everyday commuters trying to drive along side people out there driving like it’s GTA.

        The only places where it’s actually 85 are places where the air lift won’t make it to the hospital in time.

        I’ve got my problems with Texas’ infrastructure but removing speed limits wouldn’t help.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That’s always been my thoughts on the matter. Don’t enforce speed. Enforce proper lane usage and following distance.

  • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I don’t think I’m autistic. But it tickles my brain that the speed limit is one USian law that is designed to NOT be followed literally.

    If it were, it would be trivial to use automatic toll reader cameras to give everyone who speeds a ticket. They have a time stamp when you enter the toll road. They have a time stamp when you exit. They can calculate mathematically that if your average speed is higher than the limit, you broke the speed limit.

    But they don’t do this, because society does NOT believe in following this specific law (speed limits)… because why exactly?

    There is an unwritten rule in society that the speed limit law is not meant to be followed literally?

    I hate it.

    • mikezeman@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Another factor that hasn’t been mentioned yet is it gives cops pretty unilateral right to pull you over if they feel like it. IANAL, but in many places it’s illegal for a cop to pull you over just for “being suspicious”, but because of speeding and various other traffic laws on the books that are almost universally ignored, they can pull you over for speeding, then decide you seem suspicious and search your car, breathalyze you, etc.

    • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The other aspect is that we typically are against automated enforcement regardless of the law.

      We typically want people to be in the loop. If there were more visible traffic cops, people tend to slow down to the limit.

    • Spice Hoarder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There are plenty of stories in our folklore of times people sped 100+ just to get to the emergency room on time.

    • BlackVenom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Prima fascie.

      No body is driving perfect, speedometers aren’t perfect, and such automatic devices aren’t perfect nor can they identify the driver yet. I believe they use these elsewhere like UK… But most likely have a bit of wiggle room

      It may be necessary to speed up to avoid or pass something reasonably and ultimately the speed limit is so for most conditions. In a 70 it may be reasonable to do 80 on a clear, sunny day with minimal traffic. After all it’s still 70 at dark when your visibility is cut way back. Plus it can’t be a hard rule given weather conditions, traffic speed differentials, etc… 70 may be too fast or otherwise.

      It’s not that big of a deal unless you’re the one driving too fast or slow relative the everyone else.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Depends on where. I’m going the speed limit through town or less where there are people. It saves lives.

    But highways are built for fast driving and cars continue to get safer and more performant. Fuck the speed limit set for 1970’s death traps and hasn’t changed.

    The real problem as always is local roads designed like highways. Stroads seem to be one of the underrated evils of modern society

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Cars might have gotten better, but a lot of highways haven’t been improved enough for those higher speeds. For example, there’s a lot of on ramps in older cities with very short merge zones, and you need to hammer the throttle and pray that there’s a spot for you by the time you hit the end.

      This is especially true if the person in front of you refuses to accelerate to highway speeds to merge safely, simply hoping that people will be nice enough to let them in.

      There’s one near me where I’ve almost been in accidents just about every time I use it.

    • BlackVenom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The speed limit has raised since those death machines… Specifically because it was lowered due to that oil crisis.

  • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Driving school and being pulled over has taught me that the silly numbers are not the maximum speed, theyre the minimum speed, and the actual maximum is 5-10 higher depending on what other people are doing. “Going with the speed of traffic and going fast enough to prevent lane changes” is the real answer.

    Ive begun going the exact speed limit in the right lane and ive been pulled over 3 times now and experienced more roadrage than i thought possible. I never got pulled over going 90 in a 70, or 30 in a 25, or 45 in a 35.

    People are in such a hurry to save 0-30 seconds on their 15 minute drive

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Can you tell these stories? I didn’t think cops would pull you over for going the speed limit in the right lane.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        My mother-in-law has been pulled over for doing the speed limit three times in her life. Each time given a warning and told by the cops she’s making everyone else less safe.

      • humblearrogant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You get pulled over for impeeding traffic, it’s pretty rare to get a ticket and would fail in court. Usually it’s a warning. A waste of tax dollars.

      • RFKJrsBrainworm@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I mean the police probably figured anyone actually going the speed limit has got to be up to something pretty bad if they’re going the speed limit.

  • CarpalTunnelButt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The American mindset seems to be drive as fast as possible without being pulled over. Therefore the default speed tends to be driving 5mph over the speed limit. So, the government should just set the speed limit to 5mph under what they actually want and then it’ll be fine.

    • BlackVenom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They basically do just that. If you ever see a pair of tubes across the roadway, they’re measuring speeds. They set the speed limit at a percentile. Plus or minus and politics dependent…

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The models used actually take speed reductions due to things like unseen conditions, uncertainty about driving over mystery hoses and excessive speed in an attempt to manipulate the data to get a higher speed limit into account.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              What a weird thing to say.

              Beyond that doing one does not in any way prevent the other from also being worked on at the same time, this is how roads are made better. After trivial assumptions like site/soil surveys, traffic studies are the most influential aspect transport engineers consider when working on a project.

  • 87Six@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It quite literally is.

    If you don’t keep up with traffic, people pass you, and that is much more dangerous than an extra 10mph

    • Bieren@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’ve had people blow past me at like 20-30 over. Swerving all over through traffic. Only for me to pull up beside them at the stop light at the top of the exit ramp. Worth it. Not saying it’s always the case. But it’s funny af when it does.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Then people should stop passing, and realise an ekstra 5 mph isn’t going to get you to your destination any faster?

      • 87Six@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Good luck telling that to your average moron on the road

        We don’t live in fantasy land where common sense exists and we have to work around that

        • MBech@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Sure, but just because they are morons, doesn’t mean I have to drive faster than what I deem is safe.

          • MonkRome@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The safest speed is nearly always the average speed of traffic, this is well studied…

            • 87Six@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Can’t argue with facts with someone that goes off feelings

            • MBech@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              That is true, but that doesn’t mean I feel safe driving as fast as other drivers. It doesn’t mean I feel confident in my ability to react in time, if something was to happen a few cars ahead. Is it statistically safest? Absolutely, but that doesn’t mean everyone is equally safe going that speed.

              • 87Six@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                If you don’t feel confident driving the usual flow of traffic you shouldn’t be driving

                So many times I’ve had to slam on brakes to let an idiot get back in their side after a pass because some slowpoke idiot is doing 60kmph on a 100kmph road and a whole column is passing them

                If you don’t speed tf up you will get yourself or someone else killed

                When you’re alone on the road drive whatever speed you like

                • MBech@feddit.dk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  We’re generally talking about people driving over the speedlimit on this post. Someone doing 60km/h in a 100 km/h zone isn’t the point of discussion. Someone driving 120 km/h in a 100 km/h zone is the problem. You can’t blame the people simply following the laws for the actions of people breaking the laws.

      • BlackVenom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah but if you’re the odd one out, you’re the problem.

        If everyone is going too fast for you, you should use a slower road and not be a danger/impediment.

        • MBech@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I think that’s a very backwards way of thinking about it. If you’re being safe, but a bunch of people are being unsafe, and bring your life in danger, that’s not you being a problem, that’s you being a victim.

          If people start waving knives around at random, and telling you they’ll get closer to you, if you don’t also wave a knife around, then that’s a hostage situation, not people wanting you to be safe.

          • 87Six@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            You’re not being safer by driving slower, your base premise is wrong

            • MBech@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              My base premise is faster drivers being the source of slower drivers being unsafe, not the other way around. Thus the slower drivers are the victims of this, and shouldn’t be blamed for driving slower, and definately shouldn’t be encouraged to driver faster, just because a bunch of assholes think they’re more important than everyone else.

              • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                They should be encouraged and enabled to not drive at all.

                Slow drivers are a big reason why I want free and abundant public transportation.

  • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    15 hours ago

    the real answer to question “why people speed” is someplace closer to “why was this neighbourhood road designed like a freeway”. Another is “why is it safe to have virtually no speed limits on Autobahns?”. I mean people act on environmental queues - from the size of lanes to what speed fellow motorists are observing. Just pinning it on individuals is incorrect. HOWEVER there are entitled arseholes out there who will totally ride jour read bumper at high speed because they need to pass you only to turn off at nearest exit.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      “why was this neighbourhood road designed like a freeway”

      The stroad by my house is five lanes wide with a 45mph speed limit but still has crosswalks that nobody can use because it’s a five lane road with people doing 45mph and many people have already been killed crossing. So many that children are bussed from the school across the road because it’s too dangerous to even have a crossing guard.

      You read that right: Kids who live less than 200 feet from the school can’t walk there because the road is too dangerous.

      And we can’t get the speed limit lowered because it’s a state highway and the state says it has to be 45 and the local community has no say in it.

      And people wonder why I hate authority.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    That’s because it is.

    Try driving through I-5 in Los Angeles following the speed limit. I dare you.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    In the US it indeed is ok to be speeding, because it’s a car focused state, and human lives have no value in that country. As long as you have money of course, so you can afford the tickets. So speeding is for the rich, and it’s ok. But if you’re poor, are speeding and caused an accident, that’s also fine. Just another slave in prison. You see? Dystopia full circle.

  • Cypressed@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    it’s more like, “if I don’t, the psycho behind me will gut me like a fish and then fashion my skin into an extremely ineffective shower curtain”

    yeah i know that he shouldn’t do that because it’s illegal, but the world is full of highly principled corpses and there are people who are depending on me to be alive.

    at least i get to cruise slow and steady when there happens to be no one else behind me… and what’s wild is, ever since i grew the fuck up and stopped being a speeder piece of shit, i hardly ever encounter traffic jams anymore, and i don’t seem to get where i’m going any later than i would have otherwise.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    also changing lanes very quickly while driving at high speeds, without signalling, after pandemic, people got worst.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I used to pile on to comments like this, because it was such a significant change for the worse. But fwiw my subjective opinion is people are finally recovering from pandemic. All those bad driving habits people seemed to have picked up …. This summer I’m really not seeing them as much anymore!

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 day ago

    People will always drive at the speed that feels safe, it’s not just Americans. Gradually here this is being recognized, and roads narrowed, speed bumps added, etc. in places where we need to go slowly. At my work complex the stated limit is 10 mph and even on my bike I am speeding, and cars are passing me, but it doesn’t feel unsafe at all.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Right, this is one of those things where I seemed to have a very different experience than many Americans …. But we have older roads that are narrow and winding. The towns were all built out before cars and never really got to the “stroad” stage of dystopia. All those “design elements” come for free

    • square@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Behavioral engineering is way more effective than posted speed limits that often didn’t seem to correlate with reality.

      If you give me a five lane stroad with wide lanes and lights only every 1/4-1/2 mile, I don’t care what the speed limit is, I’m doing 60+ because it feels right, and if someone does the speed limit in front of me I’ll probably be annoyed.

      But if I was going down the same street, doing the same thing, with the same amount of time available, but the lanes were narrowed to add protected bike lanes, the center lane was replaced with a median with trees and occasional left turn/u-turn spots, and crosswalks were added between the lights, I’m going to do around 35 because that feels right, and I won’t even be mad about it. I’ll just cruise down the street chilling.

      Give people a street where it seems like you should be going fast and people will go fast, and get aggressive/angry when they can’t. Give people a nice street to roll down and chill and that’s what they’ll do. It looks nicer and is more walkable/rideable too.

    • tmyakal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      This. My city keeps putting in more and more traffic cameras, but it doesn’t slow cars down; it just generates revenue. If they actually wanted people to slow down, they’d reconsider having the main road look like a pin-straight four-lane highway.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Just to troll …… when I used to cycle regularly, they did care. All the cars were too damn slow and wouldn’t get out of the way. I hated some sections of towns where I had to slow down

        My closest call was an elderly woman who misjudged my speed. She passed me but then immediately slowed for a turn without realizing I was there and couldn’t brake as sharply. Worked out though: I was able to brake enough to turn inside her and avoid the accident, and my brakes shrieked like a banshee so she knew what she did

      • Aneb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Lol how wrong can you be, if you are fraction slower than the person behind you (type of vehicle doesn’t matter) you get cussed out in America. I literally was going 20 mph up a hill with an ebike and some gobsmacked asshole has the nerve to tell me to yield to cars behind me because according to him I don’t have a “real” ebike 😤🥱. This happens everywhere in my city, jokes on them I don’t need to go 60 mph to get to my job in less than 10 min, sounds like poor planning on drivers end to live so far away and have the audacity to tell locals not to use our roads.

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Oof that’s rough. I do pull over to the side & let cars pass when I ride in the 35mph road on the way to work (there is a sidewalk I can use, it’s allowed but sometimes there are pedestrians using it or work trucks parked over the entire sidewalk -fuck those guys in particular, then I use the road) but once on a different 35 with no good sidewalk I had a Prius follow slowly and at a safe distance for so so far even though there was plenty of room to pass. Honestly I can get to 35 on the electric bike but don’t want the cops to know, and it wouldn’t help because as the whole point of this thread is - on the road to work it’s smooth and easy so people do 45.

          Yeah, technically I have the same right to be in the car road, there is no bike lane or path, but it’s not something I’m willing to die for, I am slower traffic and keep right. There are lights so if I walk it across an intersection and wait I can get a very light traffic situation for a couple of blocks.

          Wrote the city to complain about the road though, to ask them to convert it like they did some of the other similar sized ones, bike lanes, middle turn lane.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            If someone’s willing to stay behind you that long, they’re not the car to worry about. They have patience and caution.

            This might be me. We have a lot of narrow and winding roads where it’s really not safe for me to give the clearance you deserve. But waiting another 30 seconds really doesn’t impact me. Most drivers are more aggressive about passing cyclists

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    This isn’t specific to America…

    Here in Europe we occasionally get road construction sites on motorways where the speed limit is temporarily reduced to 80, 60 or even 40 because the lanes are narrower than usual and drivers need to navigate around the construction site. I’m never quite sure how fast to drive there: if I actually drive the posted limit, I’ll have 0 cars in front of me, but it looks (from my perspective) that I’m holding up 67 cars behind me who would want to drive faster. If I keep up with what the driver in front of me is doing, I’m technically violating the law…

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Are there workers? If there are workers, slow the heck down, keep them safe. If there are workers, it shouldn’t even be a question

      • LucidNightmare@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        In America, unfortunately, and depending on where you are, this could very well get you killed or pushed off the road.

        People are rage crazy these days, everyone. Do not do this.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hint: I too want to get to my destination relatively quickly. So this is just asshole behavior for the sake of it…

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Always disheartening to see this rule of thumb downvoted. In here, of all places. People really telling on themselves. If someone is tailgating you they have less stopping distance if you have to brake suddenly. Slowing down increases time to react. It’s not bad behavior or road raging, it’s prudent sense. It can save your neck. I learned this in driver’s ed. I’d rather have a cager sniffing my asshole at 30 than at 45, and if they don’t have a lane to just go around, the speed limit is probably lower anyway.

        I don’t recommend driving at 10 under though. As in like all the time. If you’re in a safe situation you should just drive near the limit, it’s usually what the road is designed for.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      shield
      M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      First of all, you’d be surprised how many car enthusiasts support good urbanism. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

      Second, the people in this thread aren’t demonstrating love for cars anyway; they’re largely merely acknowledging the factual reality that it really is dangerous to provoke a lot of extra lane changes and passing maneuvers by driving at a significantly different speed than the flow of traffic. Speaking of which, I’ve removed some of your other comments (specifically, the ones suggesting to do that and to pseudo-brake-check people who tailgate in response) in accordance with section 8.1 of the Lemmy.world TOS. Please don’t make similar dangerous suggestions here again.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Hey power tripping mod, don’t be an asshole.

        It’s not a brake check to lightly tap the pedal to flash the light. That’s how you communicate to person behind you.

        Why would you delete my comments in the name of danger but let everyone else who says you should drive above the speed limit stay?

        • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          In that case you’d be communicating that you’re brakechecking them lmao. Once in a while i do a “reverse pass”, i just go in the left lane take my foot off the gas and let them pass me on the right, then i get back over.

          • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            That also sounds dangerous to me, imo, if there are other cars around. I would just continue to drive a safe speed and let them pass on the left. Or, if appropriate, put my right blinker on and hug the right shoulder to make it easier for them to pass (e.g. on a two lane road with the passing middle lane marker.)

            • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              That also sounds dangerous to me, imo, if there are other cars around.

              well yeah, i only do it if the left lane is completely empty to spitefully show them they could have easily passed the whole time lmao

    • humblearrogant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For real. As if my 30 year old car loves doing 80+ mph. I hate people justifying speeding. Instead of flashing my brakes lights if they’re too close I just l clean my windshield and splash their car. Instead of brake checking I just barely slow down and force them to go around.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I haven’t commented yet, but consider my situation as an example.

      Middle aged, lifelong resident of midwest suburbia, USA. Car-centric infrastructure created long before I was born. Mass transit is a novelty that’s only available when visiting the city. All of this to say: Owning a car and driving to every destination is a basic necessity.

      I enjoy the sensory experience of driving and I have a small fun car.

      But I also try to pay attention to the world around me and care about other people and other life on this planet. So even though I’m a bit of a “car guy” I can definitely say yeah, fuck cars.

      And I use the term “cars” lightly. Where I live, if you drive a “car” like a 4-door sedan that seats 5 and weighs under 3,500lbs (1588 kg), you are already in the smallest 10% of vehicles on the road.

  • Feyd@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    There are roads where speeding is so common you will in fact be dangerously tailgated if you drive the speed limit