• GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    “I don’t disagree, but there is disagreement” Is essentially what he’s saying. WTF. Just say you fucking disagree, or if you don’t, why the fuck say anything at all? Is it because you’re a homophobe?

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    So he thinks other issues should be focused on, but wastes time addressing this? How is reciting a prayer for a few additional couples taking away from Equality? Seems to me, it helps the issue, no?

  • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Leo does a god job of being Pope, in that he is a centrist. Everyone can have something they agree and disagree with him; that way he is guaranteed to reach a wider audience.

  • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Periodic reminder: the Episcopal Church exists. Has all the rituals and sacraments, the Apostolic Succession, but also ordains women and Queer people to the priesthood and blesses their marriages. The Episcopal Church is present in Germany (part of the Episcopal Church in Europe, formerly known as the Convocation of Episcopal Churches in Europe).

      • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not sure I understand this question. It’s literally a church and it defines itself as part of the “One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church” same as the Roman Catholic Church does. That latter part is debated by the Roman Catholic Church (but even Pope Paul VI was open to the fact that Anglican Christianity sits in a space quite different from that of “Protestantism” writ large–the Episcopal Church is part of the global community of Anglican churches, being rooted in the Church of England).

          • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Okay, now I see where you’re coming from. If you actually want to engage with some different thinking about Christianity, here’s a thing I wrote a ways back regarding same-sex marriage and the Church. It’s not perfect and was debated a fair bit on a different Lemmy thread several weeks back, but I think it helps introduce some key thinking about this topic. But for some reason I suspect that you’re not interested in a good-faith discussion.

            • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              the church of England, ah yes

              Catholic but really not doesnt follow the pope at all

              hmmmmmm

    • shiftymccool@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s almost like there’s a religion that covers most all beliefs. Like the religious machine doesn’t even care who gives them money while providing moral elitism at the same time

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because they were raised Catholic and they want their church to stop demonizing them. Blessing them would be a start. People are taught religion from a young age, perhaps younger than they have any kind of sexual identity. Therefore their whole concept of “them” may be as much Catholic as it is gay.

    • nevetsg@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are plenty of LBG Christians. I will try to give you the 1 paragraph answer from a protestant. All humans are sinners so religion “activity demonized” all of humanity. But luckily, all sins are forgiven through Jesus Christ. So whilst they may be living in sin, so is everyone and we are all forgiven equally.
      If you didn’t actually want an answer then it is you own fault for including the question mark.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Of course he is. See, gay couples have less kids, which will further reduce the catholics numbers… cause most religious people were indoctrinated as kids. The number of adults who willingly become catholic if not raised catholic is tiny in comparison. So they need to keep the gays among them pretending to be straight and having kids for show and proof.

  • Solaris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    In reality, I believe there are much greater, more important issues, such as justice, equality

    mf saying they want to focus on equality while at the same time saying gay couples blessings, something that would bring EQUALITY, isn’t a priority… make it make sense 🤡

    • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      the church will never do gay couple blessings as they are sinful and they cannot engage and support sin

      support the sinners, not the sin

      • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Since the “they” modifies the church, that means the church is sinful? Agreed. In that case, what…Christians support the paedophiles, not the paedophilia?

        • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          “they” refers to the act of homosexuality im european (not british nor american) so forgive my grammar

        • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          we are all sinners

          and the Church supports EVERYBODY not their sins

          If Adolf Hitler walked into the Church, he would be allowed to confess his sins and become a Catchumen

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      They believe marriage is for the sole purpose of procreation, which is their little loophole. They’re so weird about it that I’m surprised they’ve never pushed fertility tests as a pre requisite before allowing a marriage ceremony.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        They don’t believe that. They just say that. It’d be crazy if they actually believed it. Any reasonable person knows it’s just bad faith rhetoric, not a true belief.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Having been raised in the faith (I’ve walked away for a multitude of reasons) I assure you they do believe it. You’re not even allowed to take contraceptives or have a vasectomy

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            If that actually were the belief, sterile people would not be allowed to be married, and people’s marriages would be annualled when they become sterile, through age or otherwise. Unless they’re asking for these, they do not believe it. They may believe that they believe it, but they don’t.

            • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              They say those things are god’s will and thus not an issue. They leave the door open for “miracles” to occur.

              • dev_null@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Then they should be happy with same sex marriages. A miracle might occur with them just as well.

      • Snowies@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Then they should dissolve their marriages once their children move out, having fulfilled its only purpose. Staying married after you’re done having kids is lust, pride, and vanity.

        /s

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        If they truly believe that then why are they all celibate? They are chalk full of pedophiles too. Why I hate any post praising the pope. Fucker also lives like a king. Wonder how many of the popes are pedophiles themselves.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Historically the priesthood/other holy orders was a place to toss the weird people or undesirable heirs. It was a convenient way for the gay uncle to have a respectable job and explain why they didn’t have a wife. It was also a way to keep pedo types isolated but productive, at least until resources led to many orders dissolving.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Priests cannot marry. Marriage and the Priesthood (Holy Orders) are the only sacraments that are mutually exclusive.

          • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Eastern Catholic priests can marry, actually. There are married Catholic priests out there right now, and not because they converted in from Anglicanism after they married (though those exist, too), but fully cradle Catholics who were married before their vocation. Somehow this has not exploded the church or whatever. It is inconsistent and ridiculous.

              • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                This is one of those pieces of info I try to slip in whenever possible. I’m a firm believer that celibacy is bad for the mind, body, and soul when it’s forced on people. Priests may go into it willingly, but years and years of it with no reprieve does bad things to people’s minds. If the church could make one reform that I genuinely believe would be best, it is the celibacy of clergy. Tons of reforms needed, but that one is the one I think needs to happen soonest.

          • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Still stupid it’s nowhere in the bible. Makes me believe the priest thing was made for repressed pedophiles.

            • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              The actual reason is because the church was protecting its assets from the priests. Back then, priests were very powerful members of local government and controlled a large percentage of the wealth in an area. If they could get married and had kids, their kids would inherit the wealth they accumulated instead of that wealth going to the church.

  • osanna@lemmy.vg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Am I misreading? leo is saying he does NOT agree with the cardinal saying it’s fine for same-sex marriage?

    • CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago
      “The Holy See has made it clear that we do not agree with the formalized blessing of couples, in this case, homosexual couples, as you asked, or couples in irregular situations, beyond what was specifically, if you will, allowed for by Pope Francis in saying all people receive blessings,” he said
      

      Or, without all the fluff

      “The Holy See has made it clear that we do not agree with the formalized blessing of couples ... beyond what was specifically ... allowed for by Pope Francis in saying all people receive blessings,” he said
      

      So if Francis said it was ok; it’s fine. But it seems like Francis said it wasn’t fine.

      At the same time though, I’ve started to loose trust in media outlets and idk how reputable NewsWeek

      • Yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Francis said you can bless everyone all at once, including gay people, at the end of the sermon. Some want to make it a stand alone blessing like those given at weddings. Leo is saying you cannot do that, but can still bless everyone.

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      OK, for marriage. Not OK for unmarried relationships. That’s how I read it as well.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah. Cause he’s still a homophobic piece of shit, he’s just an anti-war homophobic piece of shit. We should not be surprised by this.