• Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Since the “they” modifies the church, that means the church is sinful? Agreed. In that case, what…Christians support the paedophiles, not the paedophilia?

    • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      If a paedophile is demonstrating repentance and wanting to turn away from paedophilia, then yes, we should forgive and support them in not practicing paedophilia.

      • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        They had better demonstrate more than repentance, and there had better be legal recourse, victim-guided restitution and safeguards established. None of this “just move Father Barnes to a congregation in El Salvador and hide all documentation without doing anything further” garbage, as the church has done consistently forever.

    • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      “they” refers to the act of homosexuality im european (not british nor american) so forgive my grammar

      • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Apologies for playing grammar games, but I will absolutely condemn your bigoted ideas.

        The church, as with most people, does not separate people from their sexuality. The phrase “love the sinner, hate the sin” is disingenuous at best, allowing hatred to continue, but with the thin veneer of civility that makes the bigots feel comfortable in their smug judgement. That is 100% garbage and you and I both know this.

        Stop defending inhumane institutions and be a better person.

            • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              This was in the BCs and it does not apply anymore

              “Moral” and “Good” standards change every year

              in 20 years, the best person you know could be absolute evil

        • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          We love the sinners Hate the sin we love the people we love ALL people we hate NO people

          • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Repeating the lie does not make it true. I’ve seen Christian “love” in action. Much of the time it is two-faced, disingenuous, and conditional. Not all Christians are like this of course, but enough are that it’s become a standard.

            Perhaps you are a good person who just happens to swallow the lies of religion. I know people like that as well - people who are good not because of their religious upbringing but in spite of it. I hope some day you realise you have it within you to be more moral, kind, and accepting than the religious organisation you follow. And to do it without them.

              • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Literally said “not all Christians” but my point still stands. And I have better things to do than visit a religious institution I don’t respect.

                  • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    I hate the institution for enabling by design bad actors throughout its entire history. Any good it does or has ever done can be handled as well, if not better, by secular organisations.

                    Those “few” people aren’t just two-faced congregants. They are the people who hide sexual predators within church ranks, people who impose their beliefs on others, traumatise patients outside Family Planning, lobby to divert public funds away from public education in order to funnel it into churches where there is no accountability for how funds are spent, etc.

                    Catholicism is the largest, richest paedophile ring in the world, insulated by generations of power and wealth. Southern Baptism spreads bigotry and white nationalism. Prosperity gospel preys on the poor and desperate. Religion enables so much suffering and all it offers is the promise that if you give it your money and time in this world, you’ll get it all back AFTER YOU DIE. What kind of ridiculous claim is that? If all the riches are to be found after death, why does the church need so much money and devotion? It’s a parasite, full stop.

    • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      we are all sinners

      and the Church supports EVERYBODY not their sins

      If Adolf Hitler walked into the Church, he would be allowed to confess his sins and become a Catchumen