How does that explain that tech oligarchy is a paper tiger?
Like I’m not trying to be a dick or argue with you. In fact my first comment was agreeing with you… or at least whatever I thought you were saying as it sounded like it aligned with my point about tech assets changing ownership after the impending market crash.
I honestly haven no idea what you mean by that and like 8 guesses.
edit: just re read your original comment and I’m even more confused by your drone reference.
The OP describes militarized robots as the anti-guillotine.
Today’s guillotine isn’t a sharp piece of metal, it’s a drone.
The guillotine of the future will be a militarized robot.
How does that explain that tech oligarchy is a paper tiger?
Like I’m not trying to be a dick or argue with you. In fact my first comment was agreeing with you… or at least whatever I thought you were saying as it sounded like it aligned with my point about tech assets changing ownership after the impending market crash.