How does that explain that tech oligarchy is a paper tiger?
Like I’m not trying to be a dick or argue with you. In fact my first comment was agreeing with you… or at least whatever I thought you were saying as it sounded like it aligned with my point about tech assets changing ownership after the impending market crash.
The OP describes militarized robots as the anti-guillotine.
Today’s guillotine isn’t a sharp piece of metal, it’s a drone.
The guillotine of the future will be a militarized robot.
How does that explain that tech oligarchy is a paper tiger?
Like I’m not trying to be a dick or argue with you. In fact my first comment was agreeing with you… or at least whatever I thought you were saying as it sounded like it aligned with my point about tech assets changing ownership after the impending market crash.