• Samskara@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Soviet Union as a counterweight was good for worker benefits as well. Keep the workers happy, keep the machine running.

    Western Euro-Communism was seen as a real threat during the 1960s and 70s.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Totally this. The capitalists feared that yet another country could spiral into revolution and then communism, so they had to keep the workers happy.

      The collapse of the Soviet Union combined with neoliberalism and globalism shifted the balance. Now they could always threaten their workers “If you are unhappy, we’ll move production to Singapore or Vietnam. So behave if you want to have a job.”

      With AI and robots this shifts further. Let’s see where this goes.

      • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not just moving industry to countries with cheap labor, there’s also importing cheap labor.

        These two things have positive effects for workers elsewhere because they get skilled and comparatively well paid jobs.

        A fully globalized economy should eventually balance itself out regarding wages for similarly skilled jobs.

        With AI and robots this shifts further. Let’s see where this goes.

        It will be fascinating to see a post scarcity economy. Will all people work as artists, personal trainers, motivational speakers, artisanal bakers, and such?