• acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    As a native greek speaker, I find anything other than “octopuses” to be silly. In greek we don’t say (any more) octopodes, we say “chtapodia” (the “ch” is the canonical (ELOT) transliteration of the letter χ).

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Could you just clarify one thing? I was told that the plural wouldn’t be octopodes, but octopoda, similarly to what you used for modern Greek.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        In modern Greek, singular: χταπόδι, plural: χταπόδια.

        Transliterated using standard ELOT (that maps χ to ch) singular: chtapodi, plural: chtapodia.

        The word is composite and contracted. First part originally is οχτώ (8) (transliteration: ochto) but has been uncommonly shortened to χτα (chta). Second part is the word for foot (singular: πόδι/podi, plural: πόδια/podia).

        So without the uncommon shortening in more archaic Greek it would be: οχταπόδι (ochtapodi) and οχταπόδια (ochtapodia).

        If ELOT is ignored and οχτώ is transliterated as octo, then you can get to octapodi, octapodia.

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Octopodes, pronounced oc-top-o-dees, not oc-to-po-des. Like Hercules.

    Also, using the I ending to pluralize us endings comes out of an attempted prescriptive reform of English in the late 1800s to make it more like Latin. We still use es endings to pluralize us singulars most of the time, the places where we use I are ether direct usages of Latin words or remnants of that prescriptive push.

  • MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Level 10: all forms are valid as long as enough people use them. The currently most used forms are octopuses and octopi, both valid, but octopi is malformed, so octopuses is preferred. Octopussses and octopii and rare variants of those. Also correct, but rarely used.
    Octopodes is also correct, but considered pedantic.

    Level 11: Just use what you are used to.

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Lv7: the legs [of]* two octopodum got tangled, so the octopodes asked help from two other octopodibus.

    ENOUGH OF THE NOMINATIVE TYRANNY!

    *it feels weird to use “of” with genitive, it’s like saying *“the leg of one of the cat’s”.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Quadrilogy” was such an all-out assault on etymology, semantics and reason that it just made sense when I learned that a CEO came up with it.

    • _g_be@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I spent the entire 2nd half of that video in fear that it was actually an elaborate “octopodeez nuts” joke