• texture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    “if someone disagrees im muting them” is the cry of someone i dont need to hear anything from

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    It’s fine if OOP hates South Park. It’s a divisive show. However, dark humor is indeed a valuable thing. Yes, sometimes assholes call sexism, racism, homophobia (etc) “dark humor” in an attempt to excuse what they know is wrong, but that doesn’t mean that the concept of dark humor is flawed.

    Dark humor is often used to mock and/or point out hypocrisy. Sometimes it deliberately makes us uncomfortable. We should always reflect on ourselves and our culture as a whole. That’s a vital part of becoming a better person.

    If OOP chose to “mute” me for expressing that opinion, I don’t think I’d be missing much.

    • cloudskipper@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      These guys are already so super rich, I just don’t see the point of beating your beloved creation into the ground ruining it’s legacy but it’s not my business I guess.

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 minutes ago

        Because they enjoy doing it. Look at the number of musical performers who keep going long after their cultural moment has passed. Hell I know people who keep playing and writing and painting even though no has ever paid attention.

      • kiagam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        Thei did have an entire season saying “#cancelsouthpark” every episode. They say in interviews that they don’t take it seriously but people keep paying so they will keep making whatever they want

  • realitista@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I think the only unifying theme to South Park is that everything can be funny.

    I would say that generally the characters with the least power are treated in the most sympathetic way, though, and those with the most power are painted with the worst brush.

    They do have a sense of good and evil, but also acknowledge that evil is often given free reign because good people have a hard time organizing and gaining consensus as to what needs to be done about it.

    • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Honestly, this.

      No one is above reproach and they stay on the pulse.

      However, I find the humor dated. It’s like if Jim Carrey did 30 sequels to Ace Ventura.

      • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        The Ace Ventura one is particularly apt because the one group they still punched down on a lot was trans people…

    • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Gotta love those people.

      “Anyone trying to use the obvious rational argument will be blocked!”

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    South Park isn’t exactly homophobic, it seems to treat homosexual and transexual characters such as Ms. Garrison with more respect than the rest of the cast, tbh.

    The jokes kind of stem from this idea that if something is different than the expectation then that makes it funny, including societal expectations like omission of poop or sexuality: like when Tad Mikowski gets distracted by [CENSORED FROM RERUNS] from the movie Total Recall.

  • StillAlive@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 hours ago

    What I know about South Park:

    • Its creators are libertarians
    • There’s an episode which may have promoted climate change denialism
    • The show may have also contributed to ‘both sides same’ idiocy

    Doesn’t seem like my cup of tea tbh.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Sure, but, if I recall, Gore was mocked for being afraid of man-bear-pig, their stand-in for Climate Change, but later man-bear-pig showed up started killing people, which is the show’s mea culpa.

      Two of the hallmarks of both sides media is they never admit they were wrong and they invariably serve their power structure while pretending to be independent thinkers. Examples of this are the entire foreign policy establishment that cheerled the obviously disastrous Iraq war (while anyone against the obviously disastrous Iraq war was drummed out for not being serious), and Ezra Klein’s recent turnaround on Israel due to “new facts” from 60 years ago that he just learned (coinciding with a massive drop in Israel’s popularity and masterminding an obviously disastrous Iran war).

      South Park admits they were wrong and they absolutely go up against power structures, so I throwing them in the “both sides” propaganda apparatus bucket is just wrong.

    • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not encouraging you to watch it, but this…

      The show may have also contributed to ‘both sides same’ idiocy

      Is kind of hilarious. I’m going to assume this is because of douche vs turd (aired 2004). It does mock both parties, but do you honestly think that the democrats never put out a bad candidate? Do you even remember who ran for dems in 2004 without looking it up? Don’t you think it’s an actual problem that most of the time a lot of people don’t actually like the candidates?

      There is a deep problem in American politics, so a comedy show makes fun of it. And you turn around and blame the show for causing the problem. To be honest it is absolutely no surprise that your country is going to shit.

      And just to clarify:

      When Obama won, most adult characters that people like were celebrating for days. Like continuously.

      When Trump ran the first time, they mocked him by replacing him with an awful existing character who ran on the platform of literally fucking all immigrants to death and had no idea what he was doing. Hilary was just… kind of shit. It’s incredibly obvious: one is awful, the other is uninspiring. Like real life where she actually managed to lose.

      And in the most recent season they went harder against Trump than they ever have about a politician. He spent most of it cheating on his wife with literal Satan and trying to abort the baby with the help of Peter Theil.

      In contrast, they didn’t even mock Biden as far as I recall?

      Sorry to say you’ve been misled by someone who has another reason to dislike the show (or more likely, who also hasn’t watched the show)

    • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Wow, an outdated oversimplification and two “may haves” to sum up a show with almost 340 episodes (plus 2 full, plot-heavy video games and a feature film) over the last 3 decades.

      Seems like your ‘cup of tea’ would be better described as a Dixie cup of lukewarm tap water with a single, uncut lemon seed. All those other flavors like Chai, Oolong, or Earl Grey? Nah, those are WAYYY too spicy and scawy! Heaven forbid you go out and ask an actual fan–or Hell, anyone who’s seen even one episode–instead of lightly skimming the Controversies section of their Wikipedia page

      • StillAlive@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m not going to discuss or argue about that statement about a show which I haven’t watched and don’t feel like watching (because what I know about it and its creators).

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You don’t know very much, then. You have no idea if it’s your cup of tea… And that’s OK too, lotsa media out there. Can’t watch it all.

    • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That was in the past though, they’ve changed tune since then.

      In other words: Made lotta money -> went to the libertarian right -> got into hot water because they ofended rightwing nuts -> one step back to the left.