“They”?

Gosh, you’ve posted this misinformation twice under the same OP. It’s just not true.

only if a magnet sticks

That’s simply untrue.

Many stainless pans have an aluminium core. Aluminium isn’t magnetic, but is very inductive.

Some stainless pans are made of 316 stainless steel. It, too, is inductive, but not magnetic.

I have non-magnetic stainless pans that cook beautifully on induction.

Ikea 365+ stainless is good value, induction-compatible, and IME lasts for decades despite abuse from careless housemates.

A good stainless steel weld is VERY unlikely to ever break or need repair. My welded stainless pans are decades old.

OP, ignore this person.

Many stainless pots and pans work just fine with induction hobs - including lots of older stainless cookware from the years before induction hobs were popular.

Maybe I’m having a brainfart, but what’s wrong with the headline?

This reminds me I need to have another look at Ledger, Beancount, et al. More info at https://plaintextaccounting.org/

https://www.seat61.com/international-trains/trains-from-Stockholm.htm#stockholm-helsinki-by-train

Your mum is a rounding error.

Dat dodo got FOMO.

Relevant David Revoy cartoon: https://thebrainbin.org/m/[email protected]/t/1848750/authenticity-problem

This is by David Revoy, who has started getting wrongly accused of using AI for his art

Plenty of shallow people in the world, sadly, enjoy vicariously living even shallower lives than their own.

IPMI/BMC have been known problems since 2015, if not before.

Matthew Garrett: IPMI - because ACPI and UEFI weren’t terrifying enough

Why is he wearing gloves, in this sculpture?

Fair point. Alphabet may even have decided it was a cost-effective way to generate publicity for Google Earth, which has been out of the headlines for a decade or more.

It’s still an instructive case:

1. It was foreseeable (and, probably, foreseen by many people at Google) that the tool would be used in harmful ways.
2. Google released it anyway

This is textbook negligence. Unjustified refusal to avoid a foreseeable harm.

That pattern of negligence is the AI boom in a nutshell.

I feel the same way, but can you explain how a VPN would help achieve that in the face of Google’s proposed developer verification scheme?

How would that help you?

The article says, “unverified apps will only be easily installable in the sanctioned countries where verification doesn’t exist.”

So even if you used a VPN to trick Google into thinking you live in a sanctioned country, you wouldn’t be able to distribute apps to those countries without breaking sanctions.