Published yesterday. What’s the worst that could happen?
Test it on the billionaire parasites first
AI be like.
many will die, but it’s a risk we are willing to take
“AI Jesus take the stick!”
wonder what will be the story that follows this.
Just in time for Thanksgiving.
Smart.
No it’s SMART! ;)
I am so SMRT. I mean SMART!
Sounds like it is going well.
“Just a week before Friday’s grounding, the Federal Aviation Administration announced plans to phase out decades-old floppy disks used for weather and other critical information at air traffic control centers.”
Now they use Grok, what can go wrong? US Redneck Tech
Oh great mechahitler is in charge. What could go wrong?
Turns out knowing the speed of light impacts latency between locations spread across thousands of miles; demonstrated that they never hear of the 500 mile email bug.
I hope that guy got a job
It’s a story from someone working at at university durinh the early 1990s. They’re probably retired by now.
Hold on, is the speed of light latency actually relevant to this issue? I haven’t seen that anywhere.
I haven’t heard either, but speed of light latency would certainly be detectable in this application.
The Minnesota ARTCC, for example, covers 300,000 square miles of territory with line-of-sight VHF radio transceivers (and radar). All of those transceivers have to be networked to the single control room with the controllers.
I have never failed to read this again when posted. Wild!
Amazing haha
I hope this keeps flights grounded for weeks.
Nothing forces change in America like prolonged inconvenience.
This applies to all humans. It’s not so much prolonged inconvenience as it is the speed and level of change from the current accepted baseline.
For example, corporations have gradually enshittified everything over decades, so now everything being shit, and only continuing to get worse, is the accepted baseline.
regulate AI… and air gap the entire ‘axis of evil’'s Internet.
See, in this thing called ITIL, there’s something called a rollback plan. This would also come with plenty of testing ahead of time, especially on very crucial systems.
Oops…
Claude told me it’s not necessary, the code has been thoroughly reviewed and has no errors, as instructed.
Hey man.
fuck it.
I can’t see this without hearing the drunken peasants podcast theme play in my mind.
On paper, this should not have affected anything. It was only to provide human-approved route optimization. Theoretically, a total failure should have been easily ignored, business as usual.
TIL that an outlook/365 bug that requires the user to open an attachment is only 6.5 CVE because it cannot execute itself.
… Have cyber security people… met the average, median outlook/365 user?
