What evidence are you looking for? Look at their account and the post count. Look at their comment history. Do you want me to find where they leaked their LLM prompt? What about where they used an LLM to reply to me above?
Full title: In Pulp Fiction (1994) these oranges are actually rock solid on the inside because in-universe the soft wet part inside of fruits does not exist according to the title. The title preserves the original title. The body is empty, as specified in the mapping. The image is preserved. The post is an image with a descriptive title, fitting the allowed content types. No Reddit references are present. No personal perspective is used. This is not an AMA or self-promotion.
This sounds like a lot of baseless mud flinging with little to no hard evidence to back it up.
What evidence are you looking for? Look at their account and the post count. Look at their comment history. Do you want me to find where they leaked their LLM prompt? What about where they used an LLM to reply to me above?
Wow, you are insufferable and still haven’t given any evidence. Have a nice day I guess. bye.
Don’t know where that came from, you could just click on their account and see it for yourself. Or you know, just scroll up and see their LLM reply.
I literally just asked what evidence you wanted me to provide, not sure why you’re so upset about that.
Thread talking about this operators two other accounts:
https://lemmy.world/comment/26006557
Link to thread where they don’t deny that sanitation is also their account and say “Ya welcome for the content”: https://lemmy.world/comment/26212372
Link to their post where they left the LLM prompt in:
https://lemmy.today/post/60529524
Is that enough evidence? What else do you want?