
What in the world are you talking about? None of these scores are bad at all. 149/170 is a score of 87.6%, at collegiate level. Characterizing that as “illiterate” is ludicrous.
Trans woman, gamer, sci-fi/fantasy writer, catfox. Co-founder of ZeticTech Games.

What in the world are you talking about? None of these scores are bad at all. 149/170 is a score of 87.6%, at collegiate level. Characterizing that as “illiterate” is ludicrous.

“People who speak out against this are of no consequence” is not a rebuttal of the argument.

But until we get laws in place banning AI (and reducing their board of directors to mulch), we should try to support detecting and punishing its use.
What exactly do you think drives the AI detectors?


Oh, you’re doing this kind of thing huh? Well, speaking of bad behaviors… bye.


Who says you have to destroy cultural beliefs? The issues with religion are behavioral.


How is this even possible, he is a legal resident - is his last name and skin color enough to detain him?
It’s possible because legality is a thin excuse fascists are using to deport undesirables. There was no mistake except that they failed to get away with it this time.


There were a lot of bots, but my primary reason for leaving was that I got a sitewide permaban for telling someone the ideology they described was in fact a fascist one. I tried to come back on another account not associated in any way with the original to play nice, but through means beyond my understanding they made the association anyway and banned the new account before I could make a single comment.


I built a homepage but all the communities I added to it get updates so infrequently I wound up defaulting to All just to have something to read more than once per day.


A Trump backed enterprise, not paying bills? Inconceivable!


White people have tried to exterminate Aboriginal religions. Because these religions were seen as dangerous and primitive.
That was ethnic cleansing using religion as an excuse. That’s not the same as doing away with religion. If your actual target is religion there’s no reason to mistreat people.
I see logic isn’t in your repertoire. Byebye.
Uh no, they wound up like that by having double standards.
This assumes everyone works with the same healthy boundaries to know when they are reasonable.
No, it holds everyone to that same standard and if they don’t meet that standard, they get blocked.


Frazier’s identity brought an additional connection that caught public attention. She is the sister of Darnella Frazier, the teenager whose cellphone video documented the 2020 killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis and became a defining piece of evidence in the national reckoning that followed.
There it is. That’s it right there. Fucking petty fascist scum don’t like being recorded.


It’s disturbing to me how you can think of no other thing for me to mean than that I want to either murder criminals or let them commit murder. This discussion is over.


I get you: tell yourself they’re “just animals” so you can cage them without a guilty conscious.
Actually, no. Quite the opposite. Treat them like people who have chosen to abrogate their responsibility as humans in order to fulfill animal impulses. I’m definitely not okay with putting people in cages. Irresponsible or not, they’re still people.


It sounds like you’re both missing the core concept here: Freedom is responsibility. Responsibility for one’s self and actions. If someone is refusing to take responsibility for themselves, they are lacking self control and are not free in the first place. They are beholden to animal impulses. You get me? By not taking responsibility for their actions they are disqualifying themselves from freedom regardless of whether they’re physically arrested and incarcerated. We need to stop pretending that everyone just has freedom as an intrinsic quality instead of it being a right to which they are entitled.


The industry is not a monolith. It’s up to individuals and individual organizations to use TV for whatever purpose they choose. People like Mr. Rogers chose to turn television into an instrument to teach children about life and how to live it, about themselves and others, how we’re different and alike. To look at that and still be mad because every other individual or organization that ever went on air didn’t do the same thing is just mind-blowingly out of touch with reality.
Whatever fight you’re looking for, I’m not interested.
Shit, I’m still waiting for you to make a valid point. Get blocked then, I guess.


people had been developing good values for thousands of years, without degrading their attention spans or other mental functions
Okay, so? That doesn’t prove TV doesn’t help with that. We got along wiping our asses with sticks just fine before toilet paper, I’m sure.
in the 75 or so years of its history I really don’t see any evidence that the industry is working toward putting it to any better use.
I literally just explained how, and you agreed with it. Are you sure you’re having the conversation you think you are?
Answer the question.
Edit: All right, since you won’t, I’ll spell it out for you. It’s AI. The AI detectors are AI models. You are suggesting we put the policing of AI use in the hands of AI. It’s not even close to a good idea. It’s nothing less than self-defeating.