- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or # to comment.
That’s my secret, Cap, I’m always outdated.
-Lineage User
“Be evil.” ~Google
I went Graphene a while back and can’t be happier with it.
I’d still love to see a real Linux phone that really works and really has native Signal/etc apps but since buying a pinephone years ago to tinker with it, I’m not holding my breath.
If anyone here has fears/questions about installing/using it, I can give you basics. NOT an expert, but installation was the easiest thing I could have imagined, took MAYBE 10 minutes literally following their official guide.
Does signal not work on grapheneOS?
Im bound to end up on graphene in the very near future but im trying to prepare myself for the conveniences ill be giving up, I know tap to pay is one, and bank apps proba ly wont work (but online banking in a browser works fine for me)
Is there anything else like that?
Might want to check this page (note: not maintained by GOS):
https://privsec.dev/posts/android/banking-applications-compatibility-with-grapheneos/
Signal, and its improved client app, Molly, works great on Graphene without any issues.
Honestly all my apps worked, even my banking app. I had one weird case where an unpopular app did not work, but I had contacted the Devs of that app, and it soon got resolved – I’m not sure if I helped.
So now, all my apps work without any issues.
Agree. On my fifth anniversary with GrapheneOS and it still kicks ass.
The Pixel phones on the other hand still leave a lot to be desired as reliable hardware. My 8 Pro is the best of the ones I’ve owned, but not by much considering my Pixel 6 Pro had a shitty Tensor modem, and my Pixel 4 XL had a spicy pillow.
The sooner GrapheneOS moves to Motorola, the better.
A spicy pillow?
Bloated battery
Thanks!
inflated battery
I don’t have any serious complaints about my 9a REALLY, but I’d prefer something with SD, headphone jack, and I’d REALLY kill for something much smaller. (but no fold, that stuff’s for derpy weirdos)
If Motorola offer one with and SD card and headphone jack, I’m buying it on day one.
I had looked it up, they are starting with new phones in the same line/family as Motorola Signature, Motorola razr fold and Motorola razr ultra apparently
So the closest baseline is the Moto Signature, and even then it won’t ever meet their standards. Best to start from the Signature’s specs and hypothesize from there.
The software for linux phones is pretty much there. Gnome and KDE mobile are surprisingly capable. There’s built in apps for every basic thing you’d need on a phone like a dialer, SMS app, camera, etc. plus all the normal apps adapted to work with mobile like the calculator and maps apps.
The only real limitation is with the hardware. I have no idea why all new linux phones launch with specs from a decade ago. You can get a better experience by flashing ported Postmarket OS to an Android phone like the Nothing phone or a OnePlus 6t.
It shouldn’t be like that, no idea why it’s impossible to just have a linux phone with decent specs and a good camera on par with modern flagships.
Linux phones try to build from upstream Linux, and the major phone SoC vendors HATE upstreaming their code.
They believe every character in their source code is absolutely top secret.
A middle ground I wish was considered more is taking Google’s kernel and the vendors DLKM partition/DTB/DTBO for hardware support, and putting a GNU userspace on top.
This has had problems in the past, because vendors would modify syscall tables such that they don’t match userspace anymore, but with GKI, I think we’re closer to that being a possibility
Thats always the problem with building hardware open source products. You spend millions developing the OS to work with your stuff and you get like six months before someone else is competing with you, except they didn’t have to spend that investment. The only reason we got the steamdeck was because the guys that made it ALSO owned the means of putting games on it, so they didn’t really need to make money on the product itself (kinda like with Google and the play store).
100% I got a pixel, secondhand, to allow for gOS.
All I want is a linux phone that takes good photos that I feel is secure. I need it to launch android apps in sandbox instances too but I understand that is possible.
Linux phones are always missing modern stuff be it fast charging, nfc, decent compnents, etc.
Love a tablet too, the pixel tablet with speaker stand is ideal if it wasnt the devils products.
Give me a flx1s with usbDP alt mode and usb3 and I’ll switch today.
My 9a running Graphene works with a laptop usb C dock beautifully btw, just had to enable the beta in developer options.
That is not the same thing
Sorry, what about it isn’t the same? Is the pixel not using DPAlt mode do handle external montors/docks?
It’s still just android. A Linux phone is like a full Linux PC in your pocket. Android is an abusable compromise.
Graphene is doing good work and is a great stopgap solution, but it’s not the end goal.
Ah, understood. I thought you were talking about the hardware.
This might be a silly question, but do you think it would be a good idea for me to first set up my old android phone with my bank and authenticator apps before I make the switch in case some of them don’t work?
For authenticator, do NOT use Authy
I’ll keep that in mind, thanks!
np, and also not sure if you have to use bank apps to do transfer everyday but you can try to use 2 phones. Thats what i did until i make sure the bank apps work well.
Also look up profiles in GrapheneOS too. I have a dedicates profile for Banks apps only with different password and fingerprints.
I’m about to make the switch myself. I have a Pixel tablet and a P9 Pro. I swapped my tablet over just so I can test things out. I want to deGoogle completely. No play store.
So far I’ve had to make a list of all my apps I have on my phone and go one-by-one seeing if there’s an apk for it somewhere outside of play store, and if not, then if there’s an alternative app, and then website or PWA it is.
I’ve come to realize I have a lot of unnecessary bullshit on my phone to begin with. Think I’ll make the switch this weekend, just need to find a few more alternatives to specific apps.
Check our Aurora store for apps you need from the Play Store. But ya, once you start scrutinizing the apps on your phone you realize 95% of it is just useless junk you dont need.
I have company managed apps on my device. Teams, Outlook and Authenticator. Any idea if there might be any friction there with Graphene? It’s really the only thing from holding me back and I can’t really justify experimenting if it’s going to break things
I have company managed apps on my device. Teams, Outlook and Authenticator.
That’s your first problem. If your company want to force you to use specific apps on a phone they should just buy you a phone for that
Can’t really be helped. I was getting a $50/mth stipend for it for about 3 years but then they turned that off.
Oh, they turned that off? Okay, where in the policy does it say that you’re required to use your own device? No stipend no teams. No stipend no outlook. No stipend no authenticator. I’m not giving them a single millimeter.
This, all day long. If you need to access teams on the go (because you choose to) there is a web interface for that. Same for outlook. There are plenty 2FA options so you probably already have something that can provide 2FA without requiring you to install a microslop app to your phone. I will not accept any third party management of my device.
Yah, the company I work for has been pushing Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) the last few months. Nope and nope.
Oh hell no lmaoooo absolutely tf not. I refuse to outsource the costs of their business to my own wallet.
Any functionality you miss from the stock rom?
GrapheneOS is actually the most bland stock ROM you can find, and it’s amazing for that. Android without Google. Some people complain that banking applications may not work, but it’s highly specific to a country and that bank.
I have no complaint and no problem so far, it’s the best ROM I have ever used.
Never used the stock rom on it, purchased it, turned it on, and immediately flashed it. BUT compared to my last “normal” android? (Smasnug- I’ll never NOT call them that thanks to a certain Aussie on YT) No. Nothing. That said I’m middle aged and never even considered using stuff like contactless payments with a phone, etc. Never saw the appeal of increased risk just to look like a douchebag at the checkout aisle or the drive through. Your mileage may vary if you use things like that, I can’t speak to it.
Only thing I noticed was for my bank’s app, I had to enable “exploit protection compatibility mode” to make it function like it should.
Oh, my pkcell
Did we just become friends?
Where’s Frank?
There’s dozens of us!
Would be nice to have a non Google device with GrapheneOS
Motorola is supposed to be doing Graphene supported phones soon, whether thats from the factory or with an official installer I am not sure
Won’t happen in the US ironically.
Graphene refuses to collect user data. So all those new age verification laws, yeah they just eliminated our chance to go back to the good old days of Android.
Seems likely at this moment that Motorola phones will run GrapheneOS be right out the gate as it is a partnership. Just hopefully it’s not a one sided partnership and Motorola doesn’t strong arm the GrapheneOS people into something that is more locked away and just works like an app. https://www.digitaltrends.com/phones/motorola-plans-to-put-grapheneos-on-phones-so-why-is-it-a-big-deal/
Lenovo running the show is what makes it viable, otherwise I would have thought it was a Google backed conspiracy to drain GrapheneOS resources on a product that would never release.
Tbh the mobile industry is long overdue for some competitive upgrades anyway. A lot of their underlying functionality has fallen far behind desktop OSs.
It’s too bad that the software and hardware are not wholly independent. As for Google pulling that kind of nonsense, I wouldn’t put it past them. They are as sketchy as sketchy gets. But this seems isolated and out of the prying hands/eyes of Google (hopefully).
From the outside, this doesn’t look one sided to me and Motorola (Lenovo) won’t want GrapheneOS “locked away”.
Motorola partnered with GrapheneOS explicitly because they want the highest security for their enterprise phones (in my opinion), so Motorola demanding GrapheneOS be less secure would be silly for them anyways since they prioritise enterprise (as far as I know).
And in any case, if Motorola caused beef with the GrapheneOS team, I believe in GrapheneOS’s morals to ignore stupidity. They probably have a contract anyways that states Motorola have near zero influence over the OS.
Motorola is desperate for a non-Google solution because they don’t want to be losing to Google when it has a monopoly over everything. So you may be right in that Motorola wants the highest security for enterprise but more generally if they don’t have an alternative operating system then they don’t have a future in the cell phone business.
Enterprise wants it to be managable in case of loss or theft.
Security is a nice to have.
Lenovo and Dell are some of the only companies that actually care about Linux weirdly enough. That also arnt Linux software developers anyways. If anyone’s goanna do it “right” it’s those two.
2027ish
Yeah but even then - are they targeting hobbyists and privacy crowd? Or more like some special enterprise use case?
Short answer, whoever buys them, all of the above. But consider, that with the whole world’s slide to the default invasion of privacy, the privacy crowd might well get invaded by the average Joe tired of all the shit.
It’s an HTC device, Google has just consumed the entire tech sector.
Really need Theodore Roosevelt to rise from his grave and start taking his big stick to all the big, monopolistic companies again.
Extremely lame work by Google. Infeasible? Why? This is absolutely a security vulnerability. Any ad SDK on any app on your phone can use it to associate your VPN activity.
It’s in the same way infeasible as implementing network/data block for individual apps. This feature has been on custom ROMs for a decade but never got into Android.
They’ve been baking Android for ads and surveillance and are now clamping down harder into how people can customize it.
They aren’t even afraid to hide these features as “bugs” anymore. If you turn off background data for an app on pixel, it will turn back on automatically when you reboot.
as an ad company they know that perfectly well
Lol “flaw”
Guess I’m ditching android fully. Anyone got any reccos for something with a pricetag that won’t make me cry and no Google bullshit?
Used Pixel 3 with pmOS. Under $100, too!
