• BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 days ago

      The amount of “modern” companies I had to fax shit too when my dad died was infuriating! Hyundai, Target, etc etc etc. Email is a thing dumb ass companies! Fuck me.

      • gummi134@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        2 days ago

        Many government departments and private companies consider faxed documents as a duplicated “original”, instead of a copy. Because that totally makes sense.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I can’t exactly recommend the service which can be a bit annoying but clicksend allows you to send faxes and actually letters for pretty cheap. the letter thing is pretty nice when something demands a physical one. you upload a pdf and it gets printed and mailed out. fax works same way. fax is way cheaper obviously.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            youd be surprised. most required mail stuff is straight up bullshit type stuff and not really that senstitive. its usually just hoops they through up to slow down and stymie anything your entitled to.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            just faster. you have to have a printer and paper for it and envelopes and stamps. with the service you just upload the pdf and put in the address and hit send. I mean I think most could see how it can be useful. Bit cheaper to print and fold and seal and stamp and drop in the box but with as unoften as I need to send a physical letter I like it.

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Then you need a printer, printer ink, an envelope, and stamps. If you really don’t send mail out that frequently, I can see the appeal of it. Could easily be cheaper. I also imagine it might have some utility to ADHD folks.

            • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              It just occurred to me: I doubt my 26 year old son has ever sent anything in the mail himself. If he wants to send a message, it’s email or text, and if he wants to send a gift, he’ll order it on Amazon and have it delivered. I’ll have to ask him if he’s ever actually mailed anything.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        It already has. Vast majority of companies still handling fax are using VoIP fax modems with digital receivers that turn it into a PDF. I haven’t seen a functioning copper landline probably since 2015…

      • jdr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think the reason I didn’t know it is because it isn’t true.

        Unless you’re a Lincoln truther who thinks he wasn’t killed in 1865 way before fax machines were available in the USA and Japan.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          there was a period of around 12 years where it would have been possible, given that they had both been in scotland at the time. between 1853 and 1865 it would have to have been an ex-samurai.

          • jdr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            2 days ago

            But of course they had to wait for the second one to be invented…

    • phoenixarise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Faxes are common in healthcare facilities and hospitals. I would imagine that they’re safer when it comes to sensitive data.

        • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          THANK YOU.

          You know another fun thing that can happen? A doctor moves practices and changes fax numbers, and the old number gets assigned to a new, completely unrelated non-medical group. But no one told the medical entity that sends faxes, and no one updated the relevant records. All of a sudden several months worth of PHI has been getting sent to a women’s clothing store.

          Fax in the medical field needs to die. Between the possibility of this happening, higher probability of transmission failure, paper (where offices are still using physical faxes) getting misplaced before getting filed in charts, etc., it’s just a plain bad way to send medical information in 2026.

          Edit: OH, and don’t get me started on fancy, marketing-designed lab reports that use colored indicators to communicate treatment-critical information that no one checked for legibility in black and white, yet still get sent by fax. Like, fucking WHAT??

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            on’t get me started on fancy, marketing-designed lab reports that use colored indicators to communicate treatment-critical information that no one checked for legibility in black and white, yet still get sent by fax. Like, fucking WHAT??

            holy fuck

      • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        They are analog modems on a telephone line. There is no encryption at all, because they still need to be compatible with fax machines from the 1970s.

        There was also an exploit where someone sent a manipulated image via fax, which would exploit an old bug in a jpg library that is used in the software stack, so you can run your own code.

      • twoBrokenThumbs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not really safer, they just work with the existing infrastructure. Personally, I think there’s still a place for fax, it’s essentially a convenient way to scan and transmit, and these days you can get them to your email or phone (not in healthcare because that’s not HIPAA compliant). Sure, not anybody’s first choice, but I think it’s still valid.

        • ChexMax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s only convenient if you have access to a fax machine, which the majority of us don’t

          • twoBrokenThumbs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            My comment was in context of existing business infrastructure. You’re right that most of us don’t have a fax machine, but many organizations still do and therefore it can be very convenient for B2B communication. And in the case of orgs that want faxes but you don’t have one, ifax is a thing as well.

            I’m not making an argument for faxes, I’m just saying for an outdated technology it’s stayed quite useful in the modern era.