• nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    How’s he going to do that? Just more bullshit from the deranged imbecile. Just a clown clowning around.

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      The obvious fear is nukes. He has the authority to launch them, or to at least give the order to do so.

      Scary stuff

  • Redditsux@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    If the stupid US laws don’t persecute this war criminal, international court should. There’s more than enough evidence.

  • ryrybang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m sure Trump’s spiritual advisor, Kid Rock, will talk him out of this once he’s briefed into the classified plans.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    This is a pretty straightforward declaration of genocidal intent. If the Americans bomb civilian infrastructure, there is a credible case for accusing them of Genocide in the Hague.

  • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    If I ever found myself saying “a whole civilization will die tonight if I don’t get my way”, I think I’d just kill myself. What an utterly disgusting thing to threaten. He is truly devoid of any humanity at this point.

  • spagbolioli@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    This is the art of the deal, threaten and bully until he gets what he wants

    If he nukes Iran, expect Israel to face the repercussions

    If he continues to harm China’s oil expect them to hand Iran free nuclear warheads and hypersonic missiles

    I can’t see anyway out of this that doesn’t end up with a stronger Iran

  • MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Let’s not forget that the Iranian diaspora supported all of this, the fucking dipshits.

    • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Some of them realized too late that there is no plan to “liberate” Iran after they bombed the girl’s school, but a lot of them are still raving gusano nazis.

      There is nevertheless a lesson: never let a diasporoid talk to you about their lived experiences. When the famines hit because of the global fertilizer shortage, make sure you cannibalize an Iranian monarchist or a miami Cuban first

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Trump will nuke Iran, and the trolls on here will still insist Kamala would have done the same thing.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Well, Trump has to be someone’s fault, and if you don’t blame the leftists who complained about Kamala, then someone could end up blaming her, otlr the people who put her up, or kept Biden up, or even remember when people called Sanders the last off-ramp from the apocalypse. And we can’t have that, can we?

        • Tolc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Trump isnt a fault, he is a true manifestation of whatever the US represents, whatever it has stood for and what does neo liberalism and capitalism leads to. Removing Trump wont solve anything, a decade down the line someone more deranged and unhinged will replace him.

    • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Trump has been itching to use the nukes since minute one. I can easily see him dropping one on a city in Iran, and then threatening to drop another every day until they surrender and open the strait. While that is absolutely horrific, the irony is that Trump is too fucking stupid to see that the “whole civilization” that will die is the U.S… The world will shun the U.S., dump it’s bonds and destroy the dollar. There will be hyperinflation, bank runs, chaos, and a hard splinter of the U.S. into factions and likely a “hot” civil war. Trump will make clear that all of the “fearmongering” from radical Islamists about the U.S. and the western world was true, potentially igniting world war. None of this will take away from the tragedy in Iran, which just happened to be the convenient target Trump the bully thought he’d punch down on.

      • coyootje@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I think what you’re describing here is the best case scenario (if he would drop one). The worst case scenario (the one I’m most worried about) is that other (adversarial) nuclear powers react to the US launching one by launching their own, aimed at either the US, Israel or (worst of all) somewhere unrelated, like someplace in Europe or on Kiev.

        • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          That is very much a risk. When chaos rules, it becomes very difficult to anticipate all the potential consequences.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Trump is an idiot. The rest of his people vary from incompetent to simply evil.

      I’d bet my life that the nuclear briefcase that Trump masturbates to every night is a fake. Someone in his circle has long since clipped the red wire to prevent him doing just that during a midnight Truth Social post.

      • GardenGeek@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        This was / would have been the case during Trump I … since he scraped anyone with at least a bit of reason from his admin in favor of yes-man following his ideology… I’m disturbingly unsure if you’re right under for Trump II.

    • spagbolioli@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      If he does, Israel will get so heavily nuked it will be a dead zone

      Russia, China, Pakistan even India would be heavily impacted, all nuclear armed states

      I can’t see this working out well for America’s greatest ally ever but won’t put boots on the ground

      America desperately needs a military coup

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        If Israel gets nuked, it will do the Samson Doctrine, which is:

        Nuke every nearby national capital, friend or foe.

        Europe, Turkey, Egypt, fuck it.

        That’s been their nuclear doctrine since they’d had nukes, which is roughly the 1970s.

        BTW, they learned how to build nukes, in part, via stealing nuclear material from the US.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_affair

        The most insane thing about all of this is that Iran does not possess nuclear weapons.

        But Israel does, and has for decades.

    • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Possibly, but its more likely that he just commits more warcirmes and further undermines American hegemony. The point of the far left in advocating for Trump was accelerationist; it’s that he would speed up the collapse of the American Empire. No one expected that this would come without a heavy cost. Kamala would have just delayed the inevitable by a few more years.

  • 20cello@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    He’s going to nuke them ,almost the same words were used moments before the hiroshima bombing

    • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      This is the first time I think someone’s gonna drop a nuke and that it can actually happen.

      If the pedohitler really drops a nuke, it’s gonna be over for Iran but mostly for the US. Dropping a nuke is basically admitting they have lost not just the war but their own society.

          • Substance_P@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            I don’t know, maybe Russia, China and if there is mass global destabilization India, Pakistan, and North Korea could get trigger happy.

            • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              China has pretty clearly shown they are staying out of it. I also doubt Russia would fire at America over Iran. Although I’d wager they would nuke Ukraine given that the US just normalized it.

          • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Iran can however launch everything they have at the gulf states and israel, destroying all of their desalination plants and oil production and basically wiping them off the map and turbofucking the global economy into something worse than the great depression. They’ve been holding back so far, but if they get nuked they may as well just pull the trigger.

        • quips@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Someone does not know what he is talking about. This is not the 60’s.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          No, the rest of the world isn’t just going to instantly nuke the US. If Iran gets nuked it won’t be via an ICBM but more likely a traditional aircraft or possibly ship launched nuke. Until it goes off it won’t look too much different from any of the other weapons being dropped on Iran. What it would do though is instantly turn the US into even more of a pariah than it already is. You’d likely see pretty much instant sanctions across the board which would tank the US economy, and might finally manage to get Trump impeached and convicted. Might even be able to convince the spineless bastards in Washington to hand Trump over to the ICC in exchange for lifting some of the sanctions.

          • marx@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            How can they sanction us when global finance still overwhelmingly depends on the dollar though? It would certainly accelerate efforts to move to a new financial regime but it would still take years to accomplish.

            Maybe mass dumping of US treasuries could be a feasible immediate option.

            • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              How can they sanction us when global finance still overwhelmingly depends on the dollar though?

              The world has been gradually de-dollarizing for over a decade now. USD held as global currency reserves has fallen from 70% to 40%. BRICS nations are implementing their own payment systems based on the renminbi, and the eurozone obviously can operate independently already.

              A lot of global value is tied up in US investment systems, sure. But a nuke drop would make that value not very valuable anymore. It would suck and the world would be stuck in another great depression, but the rest of the world has plenty of functional financial systems to keep moving on.

          • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Theres every reason to think the Russians would consider a nuclear trigger-happy US an existential threat to them and launch a pre emptive attack. After all, the US (through Ukraine) launched attacks on Russia’s strategic bombers and Putins nuclear bunker which would have been considered suicidal during the Cold War

            If a nuclear weapon is used all bets are off.

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              Preemptive attacks don’t work when they will nuke you back. This is the principle behind Mutually Assured Destruction.

                • someguy3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  First you said Russia, not the US, would do a preemptive nuclear attack. So this isn’t about Trump, it’s about Putin.

                  Second, Russia wouldn’t do it because of MAD. That’s the whole concept of MAD.

                  You’re making no sense, so I think I’m gonna peace out.

        • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I don’t think Iran has nukes, and every other country will probably be very careful about dropping a nuke in the US. Maybe some rogue country would drop one to israel but I’m not sure this would happen becaues of MAD.

        • Ontimp@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Not immediately with Iran, but even if it would be a singular nuclear strike without any reaction, I’d cross maybe the only real red line that still exists in international relation; Russia might then use nukes in Ukraine, or China in Taiwan, even if only for the EMP or to sink a fleet of ships at once. It will cause a dam to break regarding the use of tactical nuclear weapons.

          • marx@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            I’m with you on Russia but I don’t think the PLA would consider nuking Taiwan. They ideologically consider everyone on the island to be Chinese and they also certainly don’t want to blow it to ashes just to have to rebuild it from scratch.

            IMO the wind is blowing toward a political reunification where China takes it without a shot. The opposition party is already pushing that and the US is not a stable or reliable enough ally at this point for them credibly rely on if China actually invades.

            • Ontimp@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              Not on the island but if the US now starts using tactical nukes in Iran, the nuclear power China would seriously consider its own tactical nuclear use cases - after all what’s the value in being a nuclear power if it’s a forgone conclusion that you won’t use them. Doubly so should the US prove it’s willingness to use tactical nukes now, as China would then need to expect that nukes might be used against them too, should it come to a military exchange with the US over Taiwan. It’s mutually assured destruction, but instead of destroying cities with ICBMs you sink each other’s aircraft carriers with smaller nukes.

              Regarding Taiwan itself, I think there would be valid use cases, especially for the massive EMPs given off by nukes detonated in the atmosphere. They can disable an army of drones and most civilian communication systems all at once, which seems like a very solid first strike move if you don’t want to destroy the country but cause enough disruption to allow an invasion force to land.

              I’m not a military strategist though, so no guarantees on any of this.

              • someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                They consider Taiwan part of China. They would see nuking Taiwan as nuking their own left hand. Very unlikely.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          You misunderstand MAD. That applies between nuclear states. No one will be rushing to launch retaliatory nukes on Iran’s behalf.

          Still fucked, and who knows maybe they have something capable of hitting Israel

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          MAD is when the other country can nuke you back. That doesn’t exist here. (As far as everyone knows.)

      • Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Immediate global pariah. All agreements with a rogue nuclear state would immediately be voided. All trade ceases, all loans rescinded. Every US base would be evacuated and be blown up from afar by their host countries. The word American would become a synonym for murderer.

        • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Also the Russians would rightly be terrified they’d be next and could launch a pre emptive nuclear strike to decapitate the US and israel.

          • antonim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Don’t give us too much hope!

            (I’m pretty sure Russia doesn’t give a shit about Israel, and has nothing to fear from US, considering how friendly Trump is towards Putin)

        • kcweller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          European leadership will still be kissing “Daddy” Trumps little asshole even after nuking Iran. They haven’t shown any sign of resistance up until now, what is a few extra dead Iranians going to change for western leaders?

          Its fucking disgusting, but the greatest risk to world peace seems to be western civilization.

          Fuck USA Fuck Israel Fuck war

          • Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            It’s one thing to be a unreliable, distasteful ally who at least has common enemies.

            It’s another thing to be a bigger genocider than Stalin and Hitler combined and knowingly rolling the dice on the end of the world.

            Europe knows the US sucks, but it’s better than the alternatives at the moment. Letting a nuke slide is not an acceptable alternative for any country in the world. The US would immediately be a common enemy of every country in the world, and even the most cynical, bootlicking neoliberal cannot go against that.

            Or maybe the political class is just all lizard people and waiting for the moment to Kill The Poor.

          • Eril@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            I don’t want it to be like that and I want to believe EU leaders would immediately ditch the US. But I fear you are right…

        • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          That’s delusional. The EU would never stop trading with the US unless the US attack European mainland.

          Their whole reaction to the war so far was making frowny faces.

  • Foni@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    The Persian civilization has existed since like 500BC when most of Europe was still nomadic and the Roman Empire was still centuries away, and this buffoon thinks he can do something about it? the desperation of being a loser, the audacity of being ignorant, or both

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Hiroshima and Nagasaki still exist. A nuclear bombardment powerful enough to kill everyone in Iran would almost certainly be enough that Iran would be only one of many cultures instantly erased.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          The US never had the stated goal to wipe those cities off the planet. This guy is a lunatic and will use far more than 1 nuke. He doesn’t care about consequences or the effects spreading to surrounding nations. It’s best to assume those making the calls are shortsighted and will do anything to meet immediate short term goals.

          Imagine if every city in Japan was hit at once. Would those 2 cities have been rebuilt?

          Also let’s not forget those bombs used in WW2 are a fraction of the strength of modern nukes.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            My point was, if he throws enough nukes at Iran to kill 90 million people, we’re all going down together.

            • arrow74@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              That’s not how radiation spreads. It will be bad for the surrounding countries, but modern bombs were designed to have lower radiation. Mostly so troops can go and occupy shortly afterwards. Plus the mountainous geography of Iran will contain a lot of the radiation.

              Then there’s the question do you have to kill all 90 million? If they destroyed all cities over 100,000 that effectively ends the society overnight. It’s not the full 90 million, but there’s nothing left to rebuild with.

              That alone limits the number of bombs dropped.

              Plus we’re still forgetting that a deranged lunatic is in charge.

              • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                That’s not how radiation spreads but that sounds like a good way to trigger some mutually assured destruction from Iran’s allies

                • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Radiation typically spreads through weather as its lifted into the atmosphere. Mountains notably break-up and can contain weather fronts. It will also inhibit the aresolization of radioactive dust.

                  Look into how mountains impact weather and the movement of air. I’m not claiming it will 100% contain radiation spread but it will help limit it.

                  Remember it is a function of time as radiation naturally decays over time. This isn’t Chernobyl, nukes are designed around isotopes that degrade faster.

                  But yeah Pakistan and Russia would likely feel the effects to some degree. Is Saudi Arabia a nuclear state? They would feel it too.

              • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                I’m not saying this is unlikely, I just think he’s blood drunk enough to do it. Our understanding of the effects of dozens of modern nuclear bombs on an urban center is theoretical, thankfully, but even with Iran’s geography, it’s going to cause huge problems with oil production, causing downstream food distribution issues etc.

                I guess it depends on your definition of society- they wouldn’t have a functioning government for a while, but the people surviving would still be Iranian and depending on whether they’re Kurdish, Persian, or other, might still have loyalty to the idea of an Iranian state.

                I don’t think you can do enough damage to the people that there’s no Iranian (or Persian) state in 100 years without damaging the rest of the world irreparably. It’s not 100% clear what the death of a civilization entails, but it feels closer to wiping out the culture to me than destroying the big cities.

                • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  I guess it depends on your definition of society- they wouldn’t have a functioning government for a while, but the people surviving would still be Iranian and depending on whether they’re Kurdish, Persian, or other, might still have loyalty to the idea of an Iranian state.

                  Okay this one is fun and much more my area of expertise. You’re getting at the core because it is something that is very difficult to determine. The Roman Empire is a great example, we can talk about just the west for now. Roman Britain was abandoned by the Roman’s, and yet archaeological evidence shows that they still tried to live like Romans or at least the elites did. Historical records show a clear point at which the Roman Empire left, but when did the elites and people stop considering themselves Roman? They did eventually stop, and that was due to being cut-off from the empire.

                  Then you can look at the Bronze age collapse where whole civilizations just ceased to exist. Certainly the people persisted, but few states survived in tact. People still lived their but their civilizations ceased. They spoke the same languages still, but many cities across the Mediterranean region stop inhabited. By the time written record returned new states had formed and material culture changed. We know logically the people themselves existed in continuity but their societies ceased.

                  Maybe this is getting to into the weeds and not appropriate here, but this is my field and I’ve dedicated a lot of time to it. So the short answer is it is nearly impossible to draw a line, but societies do collapse even when the people persist

              • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                Su;pposing they do that, Iran still has missile launchers and missile production in hardened underground bunkers. They won’t get them all. As soon as the nukes go off, and for quite a while after, the missiles will continue to strike at every target Iran has been holding out on: desalination plants and oil/gas production facilities. Israel and the gulf states will be destroyed.

                A plurality of the world’s oil and half the world’s fertilizer comes from the middle east so we will have a global depression and a global famine. We will all go down together.