• plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Why not? It shows that the USSR was doing the opposite.

    However, especially by the end, the USSR was effectively paying to keep satellites afloat.

    The first comment mentions as exploitation the dismantled production lines from East Germany. Counting war reparations as exploitation is not a honest argument.

    The author shifts the tone latet-on.

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It doesn’t necessarily mean it was a benefit for the satellites either, though. There’s a case to be made it was mutually detrimental to both parties.