• SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 days ago

    I bet it is from his point of view. Don’t have to pay the artists if they don’t exist.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Except when the artists use slop to pretend to be actual artists and used bots to farm listens on their totally real tracks, then spotify thinks it’s very bad

      From september 2025 - https://www.zdnet.com/home-and-office/home-entertainment/spotify-cracks-down-on-ai-slop-these-are-the-changes-youll-see/

      A new spam filtering system: Since Spotify offers payouts to artists based on how often users play a song, scammers are trying to take advantage. The company explained that spam tactics like “mass uploads, duplicates, SEO hacks, artificially short track abuse, and other forms of slop” are easier to produce than ever with AI. Not only does this dilute the royalty pool for real artists, but it also reduces attention for those artists.

      https://pitchfork.com/thepitch/spotifys-new-policy-wont-stop-the-wave-of-ai-slop/

      They claim that over the last year, they’ve removed 75 million songs engaging in what they call “spam tactics”: people mass-uploading generic nonsense; the same songs uploaded twice or thrice; cheats to hijack the SEO (like stuffing keywords in titles to get algorithmically surfaced easier); and “artificially short track abuse,” which is when people split up longer songs into short segments to rack up royalties.