• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 4th, 2024

help-circle



  • After her belongings were knocked loose during the confrontation, Kelver said she gathered them from the intersection and returned to the front of the Crowbar, where she sat down and tried to process what had happened.

    Police then arrived, she said.

    The state’s argument

    The state disputes Kelver’s characterization of the confrontation and is asking the court to reject her request for immunity.

    According to the state’s written argument provided in the court documents, Kelver was the initial aggressor because she crossed the street and approached Durham after he allegedly made a verbal comment about her workplace.

    The state also argues Kelver was carrying a concealed, loaded firearm as she approached the group.

    According to the state’s filing, Durham was not armed with a firearm, knife or another object that could reasonably be considered a deadly weapon. The state characterizes the physical contact as Durham using mild force to create distance after Kelver entered his personal space.

    The state argues Kelver’s response was unreasonable because, in its view, she was not facing an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury when she pointed the gun.

    The filing also says Durham walked away after the shove and argues that his actions did not create circumstances in which Kelver could reasonably believe deadly force was necessary.

    The state therefore contends Kelver cannot make the required initial showing for immunity under the statute and has asked the court to deny her motion and allow the case to proceed to trial.

    What the law requires

    The Wyoming statute does not simply provide blanket protection for anyone who claims self-defense.

    Under the law provided in the court documents, a person attacked while lawfully present has no duty to retreat if the person was not the initial aggressor and was not engaged in illegal activity.

    The statute also requires the defensive force to be reasonable under the circumstances.

    For deadly force, the law says it must be necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily injury.

    The court documents cite a Wyoming Supreme Court case, State v. John, which described the statute as a judicially enforceable immunity provision. The case also addressed what a defendant must establish to receive immunity under the statute.

    The state’s filing argues that only the statutory requirements should be considered when deciding Kelver’s immunity motion.

    A case that has followed Kelver for nearly a year

    Kelver said Thursday’s hearing was another chapter in what has been nearly a year of uncertainty.

    She said she looked up the number before the hearing and realized it had been 347 days since the Sept. 13 confrontation.

    “I’ve felt pretty much the same the entire way,” Kelver said. “It’s been a giant looming unknown over my head, with plenty of days of more anxiety and terror than others.”

    She said community support has also helped her through the process.

    Kelver said she grew up in Laramie and came out as queer at 16. She connected the experience to the broader history of violence against LGBTQ people in the community, including the 1998 murder of Matthew Shepard.

    She said the local support she has received since the confrontation has been particularly meaningful.

    “What matters to me the most is the local support I’ve received, because those are the people I live in this community with,” Kelver said. “The fact that I have received nothing but an overwhelming amount of support has been really heartening.”

    Her wife remembers the uncertainty

    For Kelver’s wife, Kylara Little, the events of Sept. 13 came as a shock.

    Little said she was working a late-night kitchen shift at the time. She knew Kelver was preparing for work but did not immediately know what had happened.

    Little said she eventually learned about the confrontation but was left trying to piece together what had happened while Kelver was being held.

    “It was frightening and just a lot of confusion and uncertainty,” Little said.

    Little said her biggest concern was Kelver’s well-being while she was in custody and that she was frustrated by how little information she had.

    Little said she knows Kelver well enough to believe that, given the circumstances, what she was hearing at the time did not seem consistent with Kelver, especially because much of the information was based on hearsay.

    Kelver says the hearing gave her confidence

    Despite not receiving a ruling Thursday, Kelver said she left the courtroom feeling more confident about her defense.

    She said testifying and revisiting the confrontation in a courtroom was difficult, but she believes her attorney presented the case effectively.

    She also said she felt good about the evidence and testimony presented by the defense, including testimony from expert witnesses.

    “I feel good about how my counsel represented me,” Kelver said. “I feel good about what we were able to provide as far as our evidence and my testimony, as well as our expert witnesses testimony.”

    Little said she also believed the defense presented a strong case.

    Still, she said she and others involved in Kelver’s case remained cautious because the judge had not yet made a decision.

    A separate Colorado police report appears in the court record

    The court materials provided for the case also include a 2023 University of Colorado Boulder Police Department report involving Durham, who is identified in that report as a student living at Williams Village North in Boulder.

    According to the report, officers responded to the residence on Jan. 26, 2023, after a roommate, Andrew Perper, called 911 because he was afraid of Durham.

    The report says Perper had become uncomfortable after learning about Durham’s views toward different ethnicities. According to the report, Perper did not tell officers that Durham had threatened him but said he was afraid to confront him because Durham had a box of knives locked in his room.

    Officers spoke with Perper and two friends, according to the report, before going to Durham’s room.

    The report says officers found Durham intoxicated and that officers observed slurred speech and difficulty answering questions.

    According to the report, Durham was eventually transported by American Medical Response to a hospital for evaluation. He was issued a written warning for being intoxicated.

    A supplemental report included in the court materials says Perper later told police he had seen concerning material on Durham’s laptop, including what he described as group chats involving activist groups. The report says Perper and his friend told police they did not observe threatening messages that would cause alarm for the public, but they were concerned about Durham’s alleged affiliations and comments they said they had heard while he was intoxicated.

    The report is from 2023 and describes a separate incident in Colorado. It does not establish what happened during the 2025 confrontation in Laramie.

    Waiting for the decision

    After roughly three hours in court, the hearing ended without an immediate ruling.

    Little said she had expected to know the outcome Thursday and was disappointed to learn the judge would issue the decision later.

    “I had hoped that we were going to have an answer by today,” Little said. “So, a little sad about having to sit and wait in anticipation.”

    Kelver said the waiting itself has become familiar. She said she has experienced periods of anxiety and fear throughout the case, along with moments of hope and support from the community.

    Now, she said, she plans to focus on getting through the next few days while waiting for the judge’s decision.

    “Honestly, myself and my wife and my family, we have a lovely dog at home,” Kelver said. “And I think I’m just going to spend some nights at home, maybe some movie nights and some cuddles and call that some much-needed self-care.”

    The judge is expected to issue a ruling in the next few days. Until then, Kelver remains charged and the case has not been resolved.


  • Copy pasting from phone:

    Wyoming’s “Stand Your Ground” law says you don’t have to run from a confrontation before defending yourself. That is what Rihanna Kelver and her counsel are asking a Laramie judge to consider as they seek protection from prosecution in a felony case stemming from a confrontation outside the Crowbar.

    “I feel good about it now-- the actual process, the actual being there, the actual testifying,” Kelver said after the hearing. “Having to relive it all again for God knows how many times it’s been now, except this time very loudly in a courtroom. It was pretty rough.”

    Rihanna Kelver is charged with aggravated assault and possession of a deadly weapon with unlawful intent following a Sept. 13, 2025, confrontation outside the Crowbar in Laramie.

    Her defense is asking a judge to dismiss the charges under Wyoming’s “stand your ground” law, which says a person who is attacked while lawfully present does not have a duty to retreat before using reasonable defensive force, as long as the person was not the initial aggressor and was not engaged in illegal activity.

    Under Wyoming Statute 6-2-602, defensive force is considered reasonable when a reasonable person in similar circumstances would consider it necessary to prevent an injury or loss, including deadly force when necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily injury. The statute also says a person who uses reasonable defensive force under that provision cannot be criminally prosecuted for that use of force.

    The law is at the center of Kelver’s effort to obtain immunity before the case proceeds to trial.

    What Kelver says happened

    Kelver testified that she was outside the Crowbar before starting her shift on Sept. 13, 2025, when she heard a group of three men across the street.

    She said one of the men yelled a derogatory slur directed at the Crowbar, prompting her to stand up and ask what he had said.

    According to Kelver, the man responded with additional derogatory language directed at the LGBTQ community.

    Kelver said she then crossed the intersection toward the man because she wanted to better understand what was happening.

    She testified that, as she approached, the man, identified in the case as Scott Durham, threatened her, including making a threat of death.

    Kelver said she was about 2 to 3 feet away from Durham when he turned toward her and pushed her in the chest with both hands.

    She said the shove knocked her onto her back and caused an injury.

    Kelver testified that Durham appeared above her while another friend stood nearby. She then pulled a .380-caliber subcompact pistol from her satchel and racked the slide to chamber a round.

    She said she briefly pointed the gun at Durham before moving it away as he passed.











  • (Pre-amble, I don’t think the meme should be taken seriously and I do find it funny)

    Horror is my favourite genre because it genuinely seeks to express the most primal and furious of all emotions: fear. From the goriest, straight-forward splatter fest to the subtlest discomforts of tense artsy horror films, the popular and cult favourite movies offer a fantastic reflection of that generation/culture’s deepest vulnerabilities.

    Slashers like Friday the 13th were about the internalized self-criticism of modern, white Judea-Christian values (pre-marital sex, drugs, etc) and Nightmare on Elm Street was about parents, society, the government, etc, being unable and unwilling to help with the problems they created, problems that turn lethal. Suicide due to depression from repression, OD’ing from drugs because you need a way out, getting killed because you got mixed up with the “wrong” crowd at the wrong time, these were all things that happened to people because the “system” pushed you into a corner, and vilified any means you sought to escape.

    Even “torture porn” like Saw was about feeling trapped and what extremes you’d take to “free” yourself. Terrifier, too, can offer a reflection of extreme violence offering some form of release.

    Backrooms and Obsession are so relevant because they too talk about our fears of being trapped in the endlessly mundane, or attachments that we cling to beyond the safety of ourselves and others.

    This is a really general rant so I’ve glossed over and even ignored so many nuances. Not to mention that I’m really not eloquent enough to really hit every nail on the head… and each person will pull their own unique experiences from horror.

    I genuinely love it when people find something they can connect with in horror, regardless of what generation or subgenre they find.

    edit: head not hand





  • Listen, sport, what you don’t understand is that you can be a great mechanic, but that doesn’t mean that you know SHIT about the race. Fact is, you’re gonna just carefully turn your corners, brake when you should accelerate, and stay in the pit when you could be circling those losers on two broken axles. Yeah, sure, you risk a little spinout once in a while. You just gotta get the car back straight and get in the race again. And yeah, you might crash. That’s why you wear a flame-retardant suit. And yeah, the fiery explosion might kill, maim, and injure all the fans, their children, burn all the small defenceless animals in the vicinity, and the resulting pollutants will likely give cancer to the staff & crew. But that’s what the insurance is for! And yeah, it’s expensive, but y’all got to get together and pool your money, or else people in the racing seat don’t get their trophies for winning, or exorbitant salaries as consolation prizes.


  • Okay, so I have no idea about streaming services, but commercials on broadcast TV never had the volume increased but the compression.

    (I love getting lost in details so apologies if any of this comes off condescending.) Compression works by making the quieter parts louder, without distorting the louder parts.

    THINK of a SENTENCE where SOME of the WORDS are LOUD and OTHER words are QUIETER.

    compression works by squishing down all the loud parts, then bringing everything back up to full volume, so the previous sentence would become:

    THINK OF A SENTENCE WHERE SOME OF THE WORDS ARE LOUD AND OTHER WORDS ARE QUIETER.

    Now, the loud parts didn’t become louder. What happened is that the quieter parts got louder. You lose the dynamic, but gain volume. If you think it would just be exhausting, you’re correct - even at low volumes, you can get a sense of ear fatigue when audio is heavily compressed.

    Now, if you want to know why movies have quiet parts where you can’t hear shit and loud parts that are way louder, this is called dynamics. Artistically, you very much want this for the same reason you want quiet parts and loud parts in classical music. If everything is constantly loud, the dramatic moments won’t feel as impactful.

    “But wait, I don’t enjoy that, I like having my TV at a reasonable volume!” Yup, me too. It’s fucking annoying. Mixing is done often on high quality speakers, loud volume, so you can get every detail. Most home setups dont have that nuance, and most people don’t care. Until execs can actually get proven that they’ll make more money by having consistent compression, you’re shit out of luck. You’ll probably have to get your own compression, either through software or hardware.

    Source: used to work in sound engineering.