Just a dorky trans woman on the internet.
My other presences on the fediverse:
• @[email protected]
• @[email protected]
Doesn’t the Bible also say that there’s nothing you can do to bring the end times around faster?
So why not do objectively good things until then, instead?
Maybe it’s one of gods tests, and he wants to see if you’re a good person even in the face of inevitability.
I can’t with these religious people.
What do you find bad about Forgejo / Codeberg’s UI?
Source is a quite useful list of open source software that uses / supports / is supported by AI:
https://codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware
This is nice if you have concerns and want to be able to choose to avoid such projects.
Okay, so I lack the sources, so I ask others to please back me up; but isn’t this anything but settled law? There was something in the US but it was more of a recommendation than a law, and will have to be tested in court. Also, Codeberg is hosted in Germany, so its laws would apply there.
Aaaand you entirely missed the point I made.
We’re past the point where you can pretend AI doesn’t have multiple massive negative impacts. Sure, your individual use is not a problem on its own. But the models you used had to be trained. Future models need to be trained. And that cost must also be considered in each of your queries. You’re still participating in normalizing and justifying the existence of AI. All while they extract value from you and others they never got permission from.
Well, I guess we’ll just see who was right in 20 years when we’re overwhelmed by the flood of climate caused migration while at the same time having lost the ability to have any independent thought.
My comment was about AUR packages tho. Heck, the entire thread is.
Have you actually tried installing packages onto SteamOS (with readonly disabled)? Because system packages will be out of date with mainline Arch, which is already a bad idea on a rolling-release distro, and on top of that they are stripped from important stuff required to build other packages from source. It’s been a hot minute (> 1 year) so I forget if it was symbols or what exactly, but my point is the same: SteamOS should not be treated as an Arch system where you can expect additional (official or user) packages to work.
From my experience, installing (especially building) AUR packages on SteamOS is practically impossible, because of how stripped down SteamOS is.
Alright, since you’d rather argue than open up a search engine, let me be the one to do that.
Admittedly, there’s a lot of articles that are on the edge on whether or not the “most-favored nation” clause is a thing, since that’s what the lawsuit alleges. Though as I said, it has been confirmed by developers. Steam appears to indeed be clear about the policy around Steam keys usage and pricing on other stores, where it makes absolute sense. The thing is, otherwise, Valve is specifically avoiding putting this extra rule in writing. Here is a reddit thread where I found this document, which, if real (and I’m not sure why we should assume it is not) does confirm that Valve does this.
If we get to a situation – again, this is rare. If we get to a situation where a partner is telling us that the price needs to be lower on other platforms than it is on Steam, then we will typically choose not to run curated marketing during times where that game is being discounted, if that is where the price is lower, or around a launch if it’s a around – if it’s a price at launch time.
And also:
Q. Okay. And part of these conversations is saying, hey, we’re not going to offer you curated promotions if you keep doing that, right?
A. Part of our approach, if we get to a situation where we can’t have pricing that is fair for Steam customers is not to amplify marketing with curated markets.
Q. But these conversations, as you know, also involve the threat not to keep the game on the Steam store at all; is that right?
A. That is not our typical process.
This reads to me as: If Valve finds out your game is priced cheaper on another store, they will approach you to “have a conversation”, after which they might decide to just pull your game from Steam’s marketing system (or maybe off the store) or low-key threaten to do so. After all, they have the final say on what gets offered and promoted on their own store. This is totally within their legal right (MFN clauses are common), but still a dick move, and disadvantages especially smaller developers (who’d like to avoid the “Steam tax”) and consumer, who could benefit from a cheaper price off-Steam.
That’s about as much effort as I’d like to put into this conversation for now. But if you’d like to continue, I ask you to put at least as much effort into this as I have.
Then it’s still the word of multiple developers publishing games on Steam reading the terms they have to sign versus… I guess random people on the internet? I suppose hard evidence will be difficult to come by because:
I’ve seen conversations that mention threads on the Steam developer forums on this, but I’ve not been diligent enough to save this. Though I will try if I ever come across it again. It’s unfortunately difficult to search for information with my admittedly limited motivation. (If anyone can bring evidence either way, I’d be very happy.)
Already responded elsewhere in the thread but wanted to hop in and also say that no, this being about Steam keys alone is a myth. I compiled the information I found in a thread in regards to this. Some developers have confirmed it there as well.
From my understanding the only time a Dev can’t sell their game for less on another store is when they are using a steam key to redeem the game.
Hey there. Actually, this isn’t true. This is the case regardless of whether a Steam key is involved. Games on Steam need to be the same price (or lower) as other stores. I’ve found this out a little while ago and compiled my findings in this thread (plus some helpful comments, including from developers confirming this).
Essentially, Valve does NOT allow the savings of putting your game up on a store with a lower fees to go towards the customers. They however don’t care if the developer or publisher pockets the difference… Something about “not putting Steam customers at a disadvantage”.
I ask you to please not repeat this misinformation, as I have in the past.
But enumerators (aka. iterators) typically have nothing to do with enums, no?