My understanding, or assumption from considering classic physical goods, is that if you buy the digital product you may be able to resell it, but if you license it it’s not buying and you don’t own a product you can resell.

If GoG licenses you a product you can download and can archive, then it’s not bought and may not be resellable. (?)

Who manages the access, who platforms, and serves the NFT content?

If it’s up to the store to do so, you don’t need NFT for that. The store can already do that.

Ballistic.NG

Invalid weblink, so I’ll link the store page for BallisticNG, for anyone else who wants to take a peek

It’s sad the military and its personnel participates, is complicit, instead of saying no.

Ok, I’ll start removing the batteries instead and place it where it was then.

Sure, you can search for alternative sources, hope that the PDF is not just image-scans but indexed and searchable text, and that it has a jump-able table of contents, and that it has not been altered and is up to date. Or you can go through public implementations and try to replicate, infer, and follow implementations or third-party descriptions of the standard. But all of that is error-prone and time and effort investment.

It shouldn’t be like that. A standard should be public so that anyone can implement it, from either side. So anyone can verify and compare against the reference, and call out implementation misalignments.

I just want existing standards to be public and accessible, not locked behind 400 600 € ISO. That defeats the whole point of standards.

What’s the freezing point and boiling point in Fahrenheit?

Would you accept fish scale?

Is puking blobs that are on fire acceptable? Without distance propulsion.