Info Sec - Software Engineer - Game Designer - Mod Dev - Digital Artist

  • 0 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月9日

help-circle


  • I’m not sure where some of these arguments are coming from and there seems to be unexplained holes in some of the logic (ignoring lootboxes because that is valid).

    For example, the region locking has been a thing for decades before the internet. Why are keys exempted? Why would they explicitly undo a protection for weaker economies agaist foreign scalpers? I get not everything needs region locks and they’re not the most popular thing, but I can understand why they are needed here.

    The MTX argument is a strange one because games like Warframe have both Steam and non-Steam transactions which haven’t been an issue for many years. What specific kind of MTX are they really talking about here?

    There’s a lot of articles dog piling on Steam as of late but my tin foil hat observation is that it’s always the same talking points that Epic cries about.




  • This is the part that the “walled garden” arguments I see conveniently ignores so often. Humble games and key reselling, good and bad, exist because of this rule. That 30% otherwise covers Steam dealing with sales, key distribution, payment providers, and all the legal liabilities that comes with that for you. Unless you can securely and continuously run your own shopfront below that 30% margin, there’s not a whole lot of incentive to do so… But Steam isn’t stopping anyone, not even Epic in fact. The so-called wall is like a foot high.

    The DRM isn’t even that deep either and has known tools to remove it if you want. It exists as a bare minimum requirement for copyright law and Steam friends but not much else, hence why publishers often use things like Denuvo still.

    We don’t ‘defend’ Valve’s monopoly so much as they really aren’t doing anything special to maintain it besides making Steam libraries accessible on more hardware. They compete by merely existing in the same space.


  • Thiis article is doing some real mental gymnastics to come up with this BS conclusion. The reason is because the city infrastructure planning is so atrocious that our government keeps building tunnels and bypasses to avoid it like the fucking plague. On top of that, even when you do have to drive into the inner city, parking fees are extortionarely high under threat of towing or heavy fines. I would rather take a 50c train in and walk half the city any day than waste overpriced fuel dealing with that shit.

    PS: The residential parking requirement was because the housing bubble is cramming more families into shoebox homes with nowhere to park. Would not be surprised if there were property investors backing tthe study.