• 0 Posts
  • 80 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle














  • Weird since no major carcinogens are present, why do you think this image with no source and no reference to the actual findings is worth more than the plethora of studies that showed no carcinogens both before e-cigs was a thing, and in the early days of e-cig.?
    What exactly are those early signs? Being alive maybe? This is not a link to an actual research paper, this is just bullshit, come back when you have a link to the actual study.
    I’ve read dozens of actual studies, and I have (mostly) learned how to read them, and acknowledge when there are things that are beyond the scope of my knowledge because I don’t have a 5-7 year education on the issue. And then I search for info on those issues.
    Really Ḯve spend hundreds of hours investigating this thoroughly, and I am an educated guy, the snippet you show is only evidence to me of low info reaction.
    The part about inflammation is especially weird since PG, a common basis of e-juice is PROVEN to be anti inflammatory. DNA damage begin to happen from the day we are born, so without qualification that statement while obviously true, is equally obviously worthless.
    I wonder if you have any actual knowledge on the subject whatsoever, because you act like one of the unknowing sheep this may very well be supposed to target.


  • There is no source to the study, the link doesn’t work.
    Also even if I read the study, it is not a sure thing that their mistake is obvious, and I’ve seen dozens of studies that were done correctly that show there are no known carcinogens in the vapor of e-cigs.
    Or rather the ones that are detected are way less than 1% of a cigarette, which means vaping similar to smoking 20 cigarettes per day, will expose you to the equivalent of 0.2 cigarette. The biggest number being the formaldehyde we exhale naturally.

    So please just piss off with you knee jerk ignorance.
    I’ve studied the issue plenty, I don’t need to read yet another flawed study, I’ve seen plenty of those already.



  • Yes, a study, many years ago,

    If you think that was the only fake study you are wrong. There was also a study where they measured the formaldehyde using a test person, in a closed room.
    Lo and behold they found formaldehyde, and the press spread the news like rabid dogs.
    The problem was that we exhale formaldehyde naturally, and the level of formaldehyde measured was consistent with a person NOT vaping.

    But did this study do that?

    Most probably, because as I state there have been numerous studies that show no formaldehyde. These fake studies are made to push an agenda.

    Ive stopped vaping as of last year

    Good for you, I also stopped about 5 years ago, something I was unable to without the e-cig.

    it was obvious to me the flavour compounds were a complete unknown.

    Not complete, they are used in professional kitchens and industries, where people have been exposed for many decades. The chemical nature is also known and is deemed safe.
    You can also vape without flavor, which I did for about a year before quitting, the taste is actually quite nice IMO even without flavor.
    But I must admit I can still miss the taste of a good RY4 despite I’m 100% off the nicotine.