This dystopia is sofa king boring.
For those who haven’t read it: it’s Stripe, their payment processor, behind this. Kickstarter isn’t doing a Tumblr; they’re just handling it like amateurs, rather than just yeeting those puritanical morons.
the puritanical mania we’ve arrived at in 2026 was not in my bingo cards. sigh.
Wait… Kickstarter had NSFW content?
I know that there’s the occasional spicy comic or photoshoot, and I think I recently came across a kind of squishy ball you could insert rectally to make anal sex less messy. So there was some stuff at least.
A ball? 2 things internet has thought me…
- Never put a finger on the trigger if you’re not going to kill someone
- Never put anything without a solid base in your rectum.
*flared base
Its such a good thing to see a pretty normal part of the human experience get ripped out of every place humans gather because it makes the money holders uncomfortable.
Is not even money holders. It’s those small but loud “Christian” groups, like that one from Australia that kicked up a shit storm with Steam not long ago.
Sure but they don’t make the final decisions, visa and Mastercard, the money holders do
Shh. You’ll anger your future shareholder king!
People should ask why it makes them uncomfortable.
Behold the results of negotiating with the terrorists that we call evangelicals
Is it an ad revenue thing or a purity thing? Either way, booooo.
Probably a bit of both. Usually it’s the payment processors being lobbied by vocal “Christian” groups.
It’s Stripe. The CEO has ties with Palantir and Elon Musk and wants all porn to be banned.
Ironic, 100% chance he’s a pedo
“Nobody gets adult porn if I can’t get my pedophile porn!”
- Stripe CEO
If you never know the motivation for something a company does, just know that the answer is always money.
It sounds like it’s just insertable toys, so it might be a liability thing if they’re afraid people are selling unsafe toys? Who knows. That’s a really weird distinction and definitely one that payment processors don’t make.
Does Kickstarter have liability in general for Kickstarted projects? I’d kind of assume that that’s on the specific project. I can’t imagine that Kickstarter is in any kind of position to really do a domain-specific evaluation of whether a given project is in line with local regulations.
IIRC, no, they don’t. They put the onus of proving the project is legit on the project maker and on the backers to be vigilant not falling for too good to be true projects.
Over the years kickstarter has become just another big marketing platform for big brands (for their niche) and pushing out smaller projects.
As a former serial backer, over the years I “only” have backed 40 or so (I don’t remember the exact number and don’t want to check now) and only 2 that failed to deliver. One, in hindsight, is blatantly a scam and kickstarter didn’t do anything about it. The other one that didn’t deliver is just mismanagement. At least it looked like it. Could still be a scam.
I really have no idea, and this would probably be jurisdiction dependent anyway.
They do allow things like food, which it seems would come with more liability anyway, if they can be held liable for kickstarted things.
Why would Kickstarter be liable for someone else project.
That’s like trying to sue UberEats for delivering food that gave you food poisoning.
You can’t really legalese yourself out of being liable if it can be shown you knew of an issue and did nothing to prevent it.
Now apply that to politics.
They probably think the US prohibition didn’t work because they just didn’t try hard enough
Prohibition worked. It had the annoying unintended consequence is some people ignored it and became criminals, but alcohol consumption clearly dropped when it was in effect.
And yet the illegal alcohol market boomed and it gave massive rise to organized crime and government corruption to allow it. It doesn’t “work” in any practical sense, it just concentrates the problem and makes it even harder to control.
It completely works if you ignore all of the times it didn’t work.
It only didn’t work if you demand absolute perfection, which is unreasonable. I’m going to stand by it worked.
I already addressed the unintended consequences.
Just like the “War On Drugs” worked; Drugs won!
This is so fucking stupid. Has anyone ever thought work should be a whole lot cooler about things?
It’s a donation platform that uses Monero, and therefore, even if, for some reason, they took down your page, you still could receive money.
Yeah but how tf do you buy things with monero? 😭
I spent an afternoon trying to work it out once, and it’s not exactly intuitive, and it seems like the people who convert from normal money into crypto still hold all the strings :/
Buying a product is actually rather easy. You’re just presented with an address and an amount and you can copy and paste that address and amount into your wallet and click send. You are also presented with a QR code where you can scan it and a lot of websites even present a open with wallet button that you click and it will auto fill in the address and amount necessary.
Fuck.
Not allowed any more, didn’t you read the title!?
Aw, shit.
I was thinking about this the other day. Are the powers that be worried about innovation in adult content getting so good that people will stop seeking out real companionship? In their minds it could lead to a drop in births, leading to a drop in consumers and producers.
The only people that would consider porn/etc as a replacement for real sexual intimacy are people who’ve never experienced it.
That is generally the impetus behind religious institutions disdain for it. Their best chance to increase their numbers is through indoctrination of the children of their current members. Conversions rarely occur, despite how much they are talked up when they do.
They are, of course, wrong to think that. Toys, in practice, generally increase intimacy and likelihood of a couple having children. But not as much as being raised your entire life being told that it is the entire purpose of life and if you don’t have as many kids as you theoretically could, you have done yourself a disservice. So as long as they conflate the results, they will keep assuming they are correct in doing both.
IMO it’s more about control. I went to Christian private school. Students dating was forbidden.
They keep children sheltered before pushing them into a marriage/parenthood that is sustained by their participation in the church community. Tho this doesn’t seem to work as well these days as I know of several marriages that ended within 1 year.
From there it’s a simple matter of peer pressure to keep people in line. I’ve seen parents disown their children to protect their reputation at church.
It’s a fucking cult.
Probably only banned til 2028 or maybe just nov if this year
