Only a minority of developers. And to some degree they’re the ones who’ll have to lie in that particular bed once the LLMs shit in it.
To be clear, 16% of respondents thought vibe coding should be rejected completely. It’s not a lot, but it’s not nothing either.
It will be interesting to see how “AI” adoption affects their (already modest) market share, though.
16% of how many respondents?
16% of how many respondents?
140 per the article.
Exactly. We’re talking a pretty specific, behind the scenes kinda group.
Hrm, that cements my lack of interest or desire to use FreeBSD, I had wanted to try something that was different to Linux…But if they are so interested in LLMs and laying in the bed when it is absolutely shit in. I don’t want any part of it.
NetBSD has a no-LLM-code policy btw
It does, but also could have great trouble running on my UEFI set-up, I don’t know if I am ready for that challenge or an Xorg only set-up. I will probably stick with Arch for now or switch to Chimera Linux at some point.
Yeah I’m with you, there’s a lot to left to desire in the BSD world. But it gives me hope that there are these communities making regular software without all of the concerns and caveats of the slop
I see potential in the layout and structure of FreeBSD but slop is just going to give it a tainted image unfortunately. As I think it does have a really unique premise in terms of everything, how holistically FreeBSD is developed. I might have to play around with 9front instead, as it is a thing which has some elements of FreeBSD (it was formerly known as Plan9 before the plan failed).
