• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I hope they told their bus drivers to not brake for those robots next time. If stopping in time means putting the passengers at risk of injury, run the damn clanker over.

    • raman_klogius@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      What ass backwards timeline we’re living in that we got Asimov’s three laws on backwards? That a human being cannot harm a robot? 🤬

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Don’t shift the blame to bright ad boards or similar external factors. If the device can’t deal with it, it does not belong in that environment.

  • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Whomever allowed that robot outside is to blame. If they have grievances, they can sue whomever wrote the software or built the device. Keep sending the buck up until it reaches the top.

    • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The responsibility should lie with the company that decided the robot was safe enough to deploy. How it distributes liability among its developers, manufacturers and suppliers is its problem, not the public’s.

      • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        When it’s a criminal matter, the assigment of blame is absolutely a public matter. If you or I caused a car accident with irresponsible use of an RC car or a consumer drone, we would be facing criminal prosecution. The fact that no one is likely to face charges in this case is a huge failure of public policy.

        • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          💯 That’s an important distinction: Civil liability determines who pays for the damage, while criminal responsibility addresses whether someone’s negligence was serious enough to constitute a crime. And that question absolutely deserves public scrutiny. Automation must not become a shield against criminal accountability.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If a delivery robot can’t reliably distinguish traffic lights from advertising, it’s clearly not ready for public roads. Urban environments are unpredictable by nature, not exceptional circumstances. And a software failure could affect an entire fleet, not just one robot. Autonomous delivery may have real benefits, but public safety cannot become collateral damage in the race to automate everything.

  • Matt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The robot was heard yelling “Bite my shiny metal ass!” as it ran away.