• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The battery prototype demonstrated endurance, maintaining a stable structure and perfect reversibility over 6,000 cycles — equivalent to more than 16 years of daily operation — with zero loss in storage capacity.

    WTF!? If this battery is just half as good as they claim, it could be a game changer for storing power for solar and wind!

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The problem is that 6000 cycles in laboratory are not the same than 6000 cycles in real life scenarios.

      It would be interesting to put that battery out in the field and to see how it perform in real life conditions (assuming that they are cheap enough to be produced in large volumes)

      If they are really that good you are right, but there are always a lot of revolutionary advance in lab that never leave it.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Just make hot swapping batteries normal again like it used to be.

            In your ideal scenario would you own multiple batteries and keep them at your house, or are you looking for a subscription service where you would just buy the car (batteryless?) and then go to a rental station to have one put in, swapping batteries when they need a charge?

  • asbestos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why is there never a single relevant metric mentioned? Here its only cycles and efficiency (which I assume is capacity).