elaine [she/her]@leminal.space to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 days agoram is expensive these daysleminal.spaceimagemessage-square98linkfedilinkarrow-up11Karrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1997arrow-down1imageram is expensive these daysleminal.spaceelaine [she/her]@leminal.space to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 days agomessage-square98linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaregens@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·22 days ago4k fullscreen uncompressed picture is a bit under 24MB. (3840*2160/1024/1024*3 = 23.73)
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·22 days agoWhich is why you show a lower-res preview as default. Don’t want to wait a fucking minute to decide if i like your picture or not. Which reminds me, Chrome/ium/Firefox’s dev tools have a bandwith limiting feature. A lot of so-called web developers don’t know that.
minus-squareHerbGrower@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·22 days agoReally? I did a little web dev as a side role when I worked in a small shop and even I knew about those tools. Reducing load times under highly throttled speeds was like crack to me. Yes entire page load was 120kB. But what about 76kB? 2 hours well spent damn it!!
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·22 days agoYeah thats because you do this thing where you care about your work. As far as I can tell most people don’t do that.
minus-squareHerbGrower@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·22 days agoI was working for individuals and local independent businesses… I have noticed how much I cared about customers decreased a lot when they became massive corporations.
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·22 days agoI used to have hard drives smaller than that.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·22 days agoWhy would you have that at 100% on your webpage? I mean with the special exception of looking for enormous photos. Also, you’d store it, and download it (to your webpage) compressed.
4k fullscreen uncompressed picture is a bit under 24MB. (3840*2160/1024/1024*3 = 23.73)
Which is why you show a lower-res preview as default. Don’t want to wait a fucking minute to decide if i like your picture or not.
Which reminds me, Chrome/ium/Firefox’s dev tools have a bandwith limiting feature. A lot of so-called web developers don’t know that.
Really? I did a little web dev as a side role when I worked in a small shop and even I knew about those tools.
Reducing load times under highly throttled speeds was like crack to me.
Yes entire page load was 120kB. But what about 76kB? 2 hours well spent damn it!!
Yeah thats because you do this thing where you care about your work. As far as I can tell most people don’t do that.
I was working for individuals and local independent businesses… I have noticed how much I cared about customers decreased a lot when they became massive corporations.
or 29.66 MB @ 10-bit
I used to have hard drives smaller than that.
Why would you have that at 100% on your webpage? I mean with the special exception of looking for enormous photos.
Also, you’d store it, and download it (to your webpage) compressed.