• bazinga@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Calling the stuff you buy at Starbucks coffee? What they sell is all sorts of sugar in a cup. This is not a coffee place, it is a diabetes hole.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The most over roasted slop around, sure. There’s a reason why that place serves pure diabetes, their black coffee is kinda gross.

        maybe the coffee is gross so that it can pair with the diabetes. That much sugar needs a very strong flavor to offset it.

        Or Starbucks just uses the absolute cheapest beans on the market and then burns them for that truly consistent char flavor, which they then have to turn into diabetes to make palatable.

        Either way, it’s just not good.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        No one does that though, because Starbucks coffee is terrible. It’s over-roasted charcoal crap. If you order a black coffee, do yourself a favour and get a nice, light-roasted pour over from an independent cafe serving locally roasted, single-origin coffee. Good coffee should smell like a mix of dried fruit, floral perfume, and toasted nuts, not burnt rubber.

        • ChokingHazard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Listen man, I get it, you don’t like dark roasts but you don’t have to yuck other peoples yums. Could they get a better one than at Starbucks? Sure. Is there anything wrong with a nice dark roast? No.

          • percent@infosec.pub
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            That wasn’t about dark roasts, that was about Starbucks’ coffee and roast. There’s a big difference. Starbucks goes darker than most specialty roasters’ dark roasts.

            Also, “burnt rubber” notes often come from robusta coffee. Robusta is cheap, easy to grow, and has a long shelf life. The darker it’s roasted, the less it tastes like burnt rubber[1]. But Starbucks claims that they use 100% arabica. If true, then it’s almost impressive that they made it taste like that.


            1. There are some amazing, exceptional robustas, but you won’t find them in commodity coffee or Starbucks ↩︎

            • vortic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              They do have light and medium roasts, too. I’m not saying their coffee is great, but it’s not all burnt either.

          • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I buy dark roasts from a local coffee roaster in my city. They don’t have any fruit or floral notes, but they taste like dark chocolate, not burnt rubber. They’re good dark roasts. Starbucks is still crap. It only tastes good in a giant cup of milk and sugar and caramel sauce.

      • CoffeeSoldier@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If you pay 9$ for that it will just make you sad. Let them pour some sugar milk foam in it so at least you don’t know that you are drinking burnt mediocre coffee.