GrapheneOS (@[email protected])
grapheneos.social
@[email protected] Linux itself is heavily using AI models. Therefore, every Linux distribution moving to recent kernel versions is heavily built on top of using AI models. Creating a Linux distribution not heavily using it would require a hard fork of the Linux kernel and many other projects. It's unclear what would be accomplished by banning AI for a tiny portion of the code while continuing to use Linux, AOSP, Chromium and hundreds of other projects heavily using it. We'd still be benefiting from it.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51749088

GrapheneOS is currently defending its use of AI coding tools on Mastodon against complaints by various accounts claiming to be users.

We do not understand where you’re coming from or why you’re so incredibly angry with us. It’s not justified and does not make sense.

    • AdamBomb@lemmy.world
      71·
      4 days ago

      Human review and deterministic code analysis, just like with code of any other provenance

      • bowsertattoo@piefed.socialEnglish
        21·
        4 days ago

        so as long as there’s proper human oversight, ai code doesn’t actually compromise the mission of graphene?

        • AdamBomb@lemmy.world
          11·
          4 days ago

          Are you asking rhetorically with a specific mission statement in mind that you believe AI code violates? I’m not aware of Graphene’s mission specifically; I am making a general statement about how AI code can be used responsibly.