Someone (e.g. another teacher) asks chatGPT to generate a worksheet, prints it out on the 20-year-old school printer (which would already make it look bad)
The teacher in question makes a bunch of carbon copies of that worksheet and hands it out to students, worsening the quality even more
That would explain the nonsensical numbers and the poor scan quality. Remember that not all teachers are comfortable with tech, so making carbon copies of a sheet of paper may be easier for them than obtaining the original digital file that ChatGPT spit out and printing it out.
Lol ok, I think you need to chill… The difference between speculation and evidence is pretty clear cut to me. Evidence for a claim requires it to support your claim over other explanations. You can explain why a printout looks like a shitty photocopy either by using ai+shitty photocopier or just a shitty photocopier. Nothing in the comment or post preferentially supports the claim of ai use, other than a perceived math error.
I think this is a plausible sequence of events:
That would explain the nonsensical numbers and the poor scan quality. Remember that not all teachers are comfortable with tech, so making carbon copies of a sheet of paper may be easier for them than obtaining the original digital file that ChatGPT spit out and printing it out.
Like I said, it’s a possibility. I don’t see any evidence for it though.
At this point I’m pretty sure you’re being deliberately obtuse because you don’t want to admit you’re wrong
Lol ok, I think you need to chill… The difference between speculation and evidence is pretty clear cut to me. Evidence for a claim requires it to support your claim over other explanations. You can explain why a printout looks like a shitty photocopy either by using ai+shitty photocopier or just a shitty photocopier. Nothing in the comment or post preferentially supports the claim of ai use, other than a perceived math error.