Yeah, I honestly don’t know what to make of that, it’s personally a real letdown as Chomsky’s power came from truth telling and moral clarity, and then he hangs out with that fucking pedo. I’m not sure what he was accused of specifically. I thought it was that he had dinners with Epstein. I hadn’t heard he advised him. That’d be next level bad.
However, I don’t think that changes his analysis. Either it’s valid or not.
This is after his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor as part of his plea deal to avoid going to trial where the prosecution had identified 36 victims between the ages of 14 and 17.
So I guess Chomsky’s well honed epistemology wasn’t able to detect a pattern here, or his moral clarity is worth spit. I’m fine with either because I think he’s correct about 70% of the time, and a populist grifter for the rest.
Yeah, I honestly don’t know what to make of that, it’s personally a real letdown as Chomsky’s power came from truth telling and moral clarity, and then he hangs out with that fucking pedo. I’m not sure what he was accused of specifically. I thought it was that he had dinners with Epstein. I hadn’t heard he advised him. That’d be next level bad.
However, I don’t think that changes his analysis. Either it’s valid or not.
He exchanged emails in 2019, advising Epstein on how to rebuild his reputation and lementing how hysterical people are about abuse of women.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce9ykjlyv50o
This is after his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor as part of his plea deal to avoid going to trial where the prosecution had identified 36 victims between the ages of 14 and 17.
So I guess Chomsky’s well honed epistemology wasn’t able to detect a pattern here, or his moral clarity is worth spit. I’m fine with either because I think he’s correct about 70% of the time, and a populist grifter for the rest.