• Hetare King@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bubble will burst, many AI companies will go under, the ones that remain will have to price themselves out of reach of most people. Lack of investor confidence will trigger a third AI winter, which will affect even actual valuable uses of machine learning models and the further development of locally-run models. People who graduated college between 2023 and 202X will have a harder time getting a job. AGI will still be a far-off dream.

  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Improvement stagnates.

    Venture capital availability reduces.

    Mag 7 try to monetise to continue development.

    Business adoption is tepid as long term heavy use reduces skills and productivity.

    Some financial VC fund learns from a credible whistle blower that generative AI is not a pathway to AGI. Revalues their portfolio, enters administration.

    The ensuing fallout triggers a global depression.

  • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    LLMs are a dead end, and the massive amounts of money being wasted on them will make people too scared to invest in other forms of AI.

    So we are currently at a local maxima that we won’t overcome in 10 years. It will take much longer before we try a different approach to create “AGI,” and the wasted money on LLMs will slow other forms of AI research, leaving us stagnating for >10 years

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not convinced that investors would know the difference between a company trying to improve llms vs taking a new approach. So I don’t think it will stifle investment in other forms of AI research.

      I also don’t think they are a dead end overall. They sure aren’t likely to get to agi, but you don’t need agi to be useful.

      • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You have to convince investors why your AI research won’t hit a wall like LLMs are now - they’ve poisoned the term “AI”

        They’re a dead end, insofar as they do all they’ll ever be able to; if you can find use for them at their current level, great, but it does not look likely they will be able to do more than they currently can

  • WormFood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago
    • machine learning models will continue to improve their output somewhat but gains will be incremental and the intrinsic problems with ml-derived content (e.g hallucinations, context window limitations, long-term coherency) will remain
    • open source models will catch up with commercial ones
    • the smaller ml companies (like openai and anthropic) will be absorbed, probably by Microsoft and Amazon
    • The increasing cost of hardware and energy will force companies to raise prices for ml subscriptions and eventually lock ml features behind paywalls
    • Computer parts will remain expensive for a long time
    • Programmers will collectively spend the next decade wrestling with the consequences of filling their codebases with millions of lines of ai generated code
    • Google images will never fully recover
    • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You forgot the most important part: it will be infected with ads. Asked about what the best dish soap is? Why it obviously is either Fairy or Dawn, depending on which brand paid more that week.