mudkip@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moeimagemessage-square157linkfedilinkarrow-up1396arrow-down135
arrow-up1361arrow-down1imageSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moemudkip@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square157linkfedilink
minus-squarefun_times@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoIn a quota that uses integers and puts 100 as the average, a lot of people will be exactly average. Therefore it is incorrect to say that 50% is below average. It’s probably somewhere between 48% and 49%.
minus-square🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoIf you require scores to be integers, this is true. If you allow for decimals, probably nobody is exactly average. :)
In a quota that uses integers and puts 100 as the average, a lot of people will be exactly average. Therefore it is incorrect to say that 50% is below average. It’s probably somewhere between 48% and 49%.
If you require scores to be integers, this is true. If you allow for decimals, probably nobody is exactly average. :)