not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agonot very bravelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square143linkfedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down129file-text
arrow-up11.09Karrow-down1imagenot very bravelemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square143linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareExLisper@lemmy.curiana.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·edit-22 days agoIf you don’t use Firefox (or webkit) you want Google to control the entire web. Simple as that.
minus-squareGravitywell.xYz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·2 days agoFirefox depends on google for funding and failed massively when they tried to go without them for funding. Google already controls the web.
minus-squareExLisper@lemmy.curiana.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·2 days agoWrong. Firefox is still a valid alternative. While those exists Google can’t do anything they want. If they will go too far they will have the same issues Windows has.
minus-squarepewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-22 days ago webkit exists you’re implying specifically firefox.
minus-squarepewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agongl my second point doesn’t make too much sense.
If you don’t use Firefox (or webkit) you want Google to control the entire web. Simple as that.
Firefox depends on google for funding and failed massively when they tried to go without them for funding. Google already controls the web.
Wrong. Firefox is still a valid alternative. While those exists Google can’t do anything they want. If they will go too far they will have the same issues Windows has.
you’re implying specifically firefox.Ok, or webkit.
ngl my second point doesn’t make too much sense.