In case you didn’t hear TrueNAS is going partially closed source. However, there seems to be a lack of alternatives.

Any ideas on what to move to?

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Currently running proxmox and using cockpit to present smb, which is all that I was doing with TrueNAS. Gotta set up a few pieces manually but not really a hassle.

    • tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Does cockpit have proper UI for ZFS and NFS? That’s the only reasons I’m using TrueNAS currently and I’m a bit annoyed with it generally.

      • Taasz/Woof@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        Proxmox has a UI for ZFS. But you don’t really need it, ZFS is kind of set and forget and setting it up is quite easy via CLI.

      • Owljfien@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Cockpit does through a separate module called cockpit-zfs but it doesn’t quite have feature parity. There are some niche situations where you may need to use cli

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        Not for zfs. I mount zfs on proxmox. Why I don’t just run samba on proxmox, I’m not sure. There is some fuckery with permissions to make it work in a container and permissions are unnecessary for my use case.

        But you don’t really need a ui for zfs. I ran it for 10 years on TrueNAS and only used it for initial setup.