I don’t think so, and I also don’t agree with AI moderation nuking someone’s cloud backups…
But also I wouldn’t find it surprising if it was marked as CSAM when the artist’s cover art can look like this (NSFW). The material inside is probably much more explicit.
Took a quick peek and it’s uhh, definitely porn. Hot take: doesn’t matter to me. There’s people out there using Gmail to facilitate the torture and murder of real literal children. Why are we focusing on drawings instead of the people doing actual harm?
Oh, I agree. For Google to act like a paragon of justice on this front, while simultaneously turning a blind eye to the actual harm they facilitate is a joke. I guess as long as it’s not relevant to training their AI image recognition, it doesn’t call for the same level of moderation.
I don’t think so, and I also don’t agree with AI moderation nuking someone’s cloud backups…
But also I wouldn’t find it surprising if it was marked as CSAM when the artist’s cover art can look like this (NSFW). The material inside is probably much more explicit.
It certainly caters to a… specific audience.
EDIT: Link fixed. Thanks for mentioning.
Broken link. No idea which cover art you were referencing, but here’s a couple: Not explicit, but still NSFW
Took a quick peek and it’s uhh, definitely porn. Hot take: doesn’t matter to me. There’s people out there using Gmail to facilitate the torture and murder of real literal children. Why are we focusing on drawings instead of the people doing actual harm?
Oh, I agree. For Google to act like a paragon of justice on this front, while simultaneously turning a blind eye to the actual harm they facilitate is a joke. I guess as long as it’s not relevant to training their AI image recognition, it doesn’t call for the same level of moderation.