• jwt@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    You can look into their methodology

    I did, my opinion is that obviously that’s not a very smart way of conducting the questionnaire.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s better in many ways than the standard western way of simply defining democracy by whatever the Nordics are doing, and then ranking everyone else accordingly. China has a very different democratic model than western countries, and so usually fails a lot of checks that are only checking for norms within western style democracies. This ranking helps take into account differences in model towards more socialist democracy by checking how the people feel.

      • jwt@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not comparing it to anything, I’m judging it at face value, and it doesn’t pass the smell test. It leads to countries with a one-party system getting scored +5 on pluralism. That ‘does not track’.