Google and Twitter are not on par with “gimp”. I also didn’t say I was worried. I just noted that it makes people take the software less seriously when I advocate it as a free, open source replacement for Photoshop, which has a very respectable reputation and a business-like name. Being called “gimp” makes people doubt that it’s a professional quality product.

Millions of dollars? That’s not much.

Yeah, it makes it sound silly and non-serious to people I’ve introduced it to who know nothing about open source and Linux etc