Funny that. maybe it was intentional on my part…

yes. those are called assumptions. do you see how making assumptions and assertions about others peoples positions that they did not explicitly claim means your reading comprehension needs improvements? now kindly move on.

sure, you dont need a car in the vast majority of cities. bikes work fine. fin.

You made an unsubstantiated claim about most cities and proceeded to then put words in my mouth asserting i agreed with you. which I never in way stated. ‘where it makes sense’ doesnt mean I agreed with your position on Vancouver. Which in fact I dont since its barely larger than my current city geographically. and crossing the city takes < 50 minutes on a bike and thats literally one corner to the other, a trip I almost never make. Its 5 minutes longer than taking the public train to the same location. and 20 minutes more than a car (assuming good traffic which is never assured).

About the only thing parking mandates do is increase urban sprawl and make the situation worse.

reading comprehension is lacking.

you really struggle with this. dont put words in other peoples mouths.

That seems entirely dependent on where you live.

reading comprehension is lacking.

fastest way to not be car-dependent america is to remove the cars from places that dont need them.

fastest way to not be car-dependent america is to remove the cars from places that dont need them. I’ve lived without owning a car for over a decade in the US. surprise! building parking lots in cities doesnt make sense!

This comment should be deleted soon

This comment should be deleted soon