ergonomic_importer

It’s worse. Parking stalls take up extremely valuable land area that could be used to build on instead. The developers believe that they can fill a 44 unit apartment building with only 12 parking spaces, which is only 1 space for nearly every 4 units. Most parking bylaws I’ve seen require 1.5 parking spaces per unit, which means this building would need at least 66 spaces by law; so many that they would occupy the same land needed for the actual building that the spaces are serving. This is urban infill, but the arguments against the parking variance sound as though we’re talking about a property on the edge of the city. Minimum parking requirements set an arbitrary upper limit on how many units you can build on a given parcel as they fight for every square meter.

I remember when 2015 was going to be the last election under FPTP 🤦

Now introducing the Q Family and Friends plan. Choose 5 of your closest contacts to have 5ms faster connections for only $500/mo with a tab.

As much as I love that airframe, I have to agree. The program was never going to be financially or strategically viable.

The largest blunder of that era was the amount of brain drain as engineers from Avro fled to the US for higher paying jobs.

Boeing probably still salty about the A220