

True, but books about nutrition absolutely should cite the best available science.
Equal voting tights for everyone


True, but books about nutrition absolutely should cite the best available science.


Purchase pre-LLM era physical books on foraging, cooking, home and auto repair, electronics, child care, etc.
Get E-books released right around 2022 (but not after) on Anna’s Archive if your money is low. It’s important that the info is somewhat fresh. A lot has changed since the 1980s


Apparently this guy is Abdul El-Sayed’s opponent


If I kill someone without them noticing I would not be a murderer by that logic.


Lemmy isn’t a public park either, that comparison is insufficient.


compelled to interject yourself
I’m sorry, this is a public forum for discussion? Everyone can comment and is encouraged to do so. You seem to have forgotten that, since you treat your original response like a PM. A bit self-centred, no?
You bringing up narcissism in first stanza of your reply to the person talking about money not mattering that much is a bit of a non-sequitur. “When direct talk is warranted” reads to me like the tough-love BS people like to reference when they are being paternalistic.


Yeah, but this is Lemmy, it’s not the 12 steps program and I am not tiptoeing around them, nor should the “ban” on tiptoeing be seen as an encouragement to be confrontational.


This is unambiguously good. I hope the trend goes on!


If you are in recovery, it won’t surprise you to hear that alcoholics are often narcissists - the type who may center the whole world’s experience on their own.
Just what the guy needs to hear!


No, you made the right move.


drinking here and there =/= enjoying life


Mid twenties here, same situation. My bank closed my accounts lol


This mindset isn’t really conducive to meeting your needs.


Marx and Engels predicted that economies would become dominated by rentiers


It’s essentially this “conundrum”:
Work somewhere for the next two years and be able to lead what would’ve been middle class life 20 years ago. But your actions will be destructive.
Or decline to do that and try to get by living a less comfortable life which destroys less in the end.
I think the choice is clear. Other people have loved and just because you don’t know them doesn’t mean it’s more “moral” to hurt them, which is what I am getting at when saying that one’s actions are harmful.


I don’t know. There’re limits to what can be considered an acceptable hustle imo. I get the whole American thing about not judging what someone works. but you gotta cut it at elbit systems or ICE.


Yes, right on. You won’t stop them by voting.


No, even this is a very bad idea. Ideally, no books are destroyed. A close relative of mine works as an archivist. They have tons of examples of how digitising and then destroying can create extra burdens. The data on hard drives or flash devices is too fragile.
Very fed coded