the user I responded to seemed to be implying otherwise.

Not really. I’m just saying the quote isn’t particularly insightful upon analysis, source notwithstanding.

It’s an axiomatic truism. It’s logic is self contained.

To learn who is wet, simply find out who is in the water.

Being generic here, but the concept of Hijra is not controversial or unaccepted across SE asia, correct? Or at least to the best of my knowledge (Cambodia and Burma).

I tend to pose just having such uncontested language goes a long way for gender roles (and conformance) not being such a puritanical binary like it is in the American anglosphere.

ACKHnowledged.

https://pulitzercenter.org/resource/how-we-investigated-epidemic-ai-generated-child-sexual-abuse-material-internet

https://www.engadget.com/ai/california-is-investigating-grok-over-ai-generated-csam-and-nonconsensual-deepfakes-202029635.html

There’s a whole media cycle on it from the last few months.

You may have missed how there’s a massive CSAM problem with AI because the models are all trained on CSAM. “Plausible” is a bit behind the times.

Bombskip unless you sequence break for the doublejump before the Inquisition. Otherwise you just have to get the key the normal route after the Reconquista.