

So you’re conveniently ignoring the protectorate status? And the fact that Tuvalu doesn’t really have another choice? And that this is just one in a long line of “anti-China deals” Australia is forcing on its island neighbors?


So you’re conveniently ignoring the protectorate status? And the fact that Tuvalu doesn’t really have another choice? And that this is just one in a long line of “anti-China deals” Australia is forcing on its island neighbors?


Tuvalu is now obliged to let Australia oversee its foreign policy. In exchange, Australia is “generously” allowing a number of Tuvaluans per year to flee climate disaster and settle in Australia. The climate disaster that Australia as a coal giant has no interest in stopping, or better yet, compensate the island nations for instead of slowly absorbing their governments and populations


What Australia is doing to Tuvalu for example is also completely unforgivable. Holding a country in a precarious situation hostage is not the lesson we should have learned after China expanded its influence in the pacific
Sometimes kids are just assholes. That kind of pathologizing is genuinely harmful
Yeah. More than this I’d like to go back and be a better person next time
Nice, had the same thought and was gonna stop doing that
I don’t understand why there’s so many people who don’t want Lemmy to grow. I came here because I wanted a freeer more decentralised web for everyone, not just me.
Someone noticed! You’re welcome, could I improve anything?


Well yeah, that’s what being overwhelmed means


eh, kinda? Decentralisation means one instance can learn from the failures of another, and there’s bo one thing that can bring the entire Fediverse down. But that’s a worst case scenario.
What I fear is this: A spike of interest in the fediverse leads to many instances being overwhelmed, and the general newbie experience quickly turns many people away, leading to lots of people leaving with a sour taste. In the meantime, instances successfully adapt and new ones spring up, but most users aren’t coming back.
Imo that’s a more realistic scenario than some grandiose failure, and you could say it’s already happened several times.


Well you have to wonder if at a support so high Wikimedia couldn’t skip the “fight and win” stage to earn some goodwill which might get them more favourable terms. In open confrontation, everyone loses. Takes energy away from everything else and generates a ton of bad publicity.


Been a while but since this post I’ve actually had to get a spare part and had no trouble, years after launch


Hey, so I looked it up again and you’re not actually dumb. Grizzlys and Kodiaks are sub-species, so when I said they aren’t species that was only half true.
However, only the first part is capitalised, so it’s Grizzly bear and Kodiak bear, maybe because bear is the species and Grizzly/Kodiak isn’t.


ah, thanks!


Well I don’t think that’s inherent to humanity or humanism. I agree though that humanity isn’t a value in of itself, because if we accept that it is, stripping someone of that humanity is enough to denigrate and mistreat them. I also see the colonialist baggage that humanist philosophy continues to carry to this day. If we’d ever manage to establish contact with nonhumans, I’d definitely be on the lookout for anyone who suddenly starts talking about progressivism and “humanist values”.


Well, I think that’s kinda the point of the OOP. Species aren’t supposed to be anything special. By capitalising the names of alien species we’re elevating them to be synonymous with culture, even though it’s impossible for any species to have a monoculture. We’re monolithising a (fictional alien) species.
By the way, Grizzly bear and Kodiak bear aren’t species either. They’re both brown bears (ursos arctos).


Well, you said species. German Shepherd isn’t a species. The species is dog (canis familiaris).


I don’t understand, do you capitalise duck and cow and eagle? Those aren’t proper nouns


I see. I did not know
Yes, actually I do expect reparations (“free handouts”) and free asylum for climate refugees.
Maybe you should ask why Australia decided to wrangle Tuvalus independence instead of just making a better offer. And also, to ask yourself for whom exactly this deal is “the best option”. Not the majority of the Tuvaluan population.