When people tell you that AI will (or already does) take a lot of jobs, it’s not necessarily implied that it’s good enough to replace humans. Just that it is sold well enough to the people who make those decisions.

Funny that you feel this way, because I thought about posting a similar and yet almost opposite post to [email protected]. I think it gets too much attention compared to other missions.

I think the Artemis mission isn’t completely useless and even regardless of Lunar economy and nostalgic motivation, there are some benefits, sure. But all of this over-sensationalized exposure with more emphasis on the USA is the reality check that we’re slowly resetting to a space race. I always thought that it was a beautiful story that what started as competition turned into the biggest evidence of our united efforts. And while I don’t think collaborations will end, I fear that they will turn into alliances and we are back to competition.

No, because I’m not dating at all.

Just to rule this out: are you certain that you’re not confusing this 3D projection of a tesseract with some other news?

Or if you are certain that you saw hardware in a cube shape, did its design give you any clue why it was named “tesseract” - similar to this PC.

Age: 9.6 - 10

I created an account at lemmy.ml, because I was interested in seeing real-world examples of Rust in production. Shortly after that, due to the death of Reddit 3rd party API, I began to spend more time in Lemmy.

I experience Lemmy as a reflection of many of the problems in the world

You’ve said it yourself. It’s not unique to Lemmy. This is just a smaller platform with therefore more biases. You could keep trying and show new visitors with your viewpoints that they have a space here. E.g. Lemmy is slowly becoming less try-hard anarchistic. But honestly with your viewpoints, whether it’s about AI or strict immigration, I consider it too difficult and unrealistic currently.