FaceDeer

Oh well I guess we’d best all surrender then.

Gee, if only a major prime minister candidate were to promise to end first-past-the-post voting as a major campaign issue, and I was to vote for said candidate’s party on that basis, and they were to not flagrantly renege on that promise right after being elected.

There are times when I find myself in grudging sympathy for those “fuck Trudeau” bumper stickers. There weren’t better options at the time and he did accomplish a few other things that were good, but that one was really important IMO. Fundamental to the long-term health of Canadian democracy.

At some point medicine doesn’t help. Trump is well past that point now.

I don’t know if you noticed, but we might be urgently needing that military in the near future.

America isn’t the only source of history books.

Well, this is a bit of a risky gamble. My first thought is “good, he’ll prevent the Conservatives from making any gains given how unpopular and useless he is.”

But of course my second thought is “that’s what I thought about Trump running again…”

I mean, if the Americans are going to destroy themselves in a paroxysm of racist insanity, might as well make a little money selling them the tools they’re using to hit themselves in the nuts with?

All my life - and for generations before my life - the Americans have been puffing themselves up about their intent and even eagerness to resist tyranny. Cold dead fingers, tree of liberty being watered, home of the brave, etc…

Who am I to deny them their moment to finally shine?

It’s worth explaining to Canadians, though. Explaining to Trump is somewhat of a Socratic method for announcing simple concepts to the world.

Ragebait. People love being angry.

This isn’t appeasement. It’s right there in the quoted text, for crying out loud.

We have adults running Canada’s foreign affairs. That means we won’t be seeing idiotic Trump-style knee-jerk reactions like abruptly trying to go all-in with free trade agreements to other countries without any concern for nuance. Especially not countries like China, which want to be hegemons just as much as America does and would love to get its hooks into Canada this way.

But the moment any nuance gets introduced into Canada’s reaction, the moment there’s a speech that uses careful diplomatic language instead of gung-ho blithering about how bad we think Americans are, it gets this “Carney’s caving! Appeasement!” Reaction. It’s wearying.

You’re just not using it right.

Anyone want to tell him we’re not paying attention?