

How so? It’s a total traffic killer, in more ways than one :P


How so? It’s a total traffic killer, in more ways than one :P


The designer of this intersection type actually touted that island as a place where you can “beautify” the intersection with a sculpture of landscaping. Lmao


I mean… the second exit is usually going straight. So that makes sense. First exit would be a right turn (or left in the UK)


Apparently this is actually less wide compared to his original concept that served 19,000 vehicles per hour.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwE3GzzHIhI
21 lanes wide, however there are medians making it wider than that.


if exercising imminent domain is on the table
It isn’t. This concept was not ultimately chosen for this intersection. In fact the inventor of this concept was a pretty… interesting guy.
https://www.tampabay.com/news/crime/2024/04/23/greg-parsons-bomb-threat-tampa-fdot-district-7/


It honestly is quite amazing from an engineering standpoint but would be pretty immoral to build in real life


I hate when I hit those children and my car slows like 20 miles per hour so I have to waste gas getting it back up to 70.
It increases the efficiency of car traffic, not moving people. It’s still good engineering from a car perspective, but terrible urban design.