135·
5 days agobut I have no proof of that.
Because I am not.
presented insight only the moderator who banned me would know
I have no such insight.
Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself]
AuDHD cat
- 0 Posts
- 15 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: July 10th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
your response is to verbally shrug as though it’s nothing to do with you and you won’t pass judgement.
Correct.
Wow, I see you following my posts
How I have followed you without opening you user page, searching for you, or using the api to get information on you I have no idea. If you can tell me so I can better understand I would be interested.
Take the rest up with an admin of lemmy.ml, or the moderator of the comm you were banned from.
Happening to be in the two threads is following people around? Pointing out when someone is wrong is harassing them? Trying to be helpful and explain what “rule 1” means is harassment?
There are instance wide rules. It wasn’t clarified, although it should have been, that it was that.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
I’ll let QinShiHuangsShlong point out the problem with your comment
In other words, in all likelihood, waves at the Chinese intelligence system running this thread.
Why do you people always feel the need to add some dehumanising shit like this at the end of your replies.
“Oh you don’t hate China you must be a bot, shill, intelligence officer, brainwashed etc etc.”
You suck.
Also only that one bad comment (calling you a shithead) was made, and not by a moderator.The comments calling you slurs you are talking about do not exist.Edit: It seems that my understanding of the word slur may have been slightly incorrect. Leaning much more to the “An extremely offensive and socially unacceptable term targeted at a group of people (such as an ethnicity, sexual orientation, etc.).” definition and not just any insult or slight. In which case I was wrong.
3·10 days agoCape Town is 4% active, 82% car, according to their visualization
4·11 days agoYou can select more than one language in the settings.
I think without anything selected it will show you all languages? And when you select some it will only show you those languages? That is what my test just showed
Southern Africa has 65%, and Australia and New Zeland has 75.9% (from the source on ScienceDirect)
1·1 year agoI think Lumelore is starting of at anti-communism, and working her way from there. It leads to some weird stuff like this.
It says that anyone could propose a candidate, and that the person elected in that specific election wasn’t part of the [Communist] Party, making it somewhat likely they weren’t a communist.
But a better question, is why is it important that they can vote for non-communists? What else should they vote for? Fascists? Liberals that wish to destroy the Soviet system and institute capitalism, thereby making the lives of the vast majority of people worse? Chapter XVII goes over this to some extent, but I of course do recommend reading the entire book.
No mention of being able to vote for non-communists
???
Anybody present had the right to propose a candidate, the one who was elected was not personally a member of the Party
The people of the soviet union, at least as far as Pat Sloan experienced in ~1937, had the most limited choice: any person
I have, while working in the Soviet Union, participated in an election. I, too, had a right to vote, as I was a working member of the community, and nationality and citizenship is no bar to electoral rights. The procedure was extremely simple. A general meeting of all the workers in our organization was called by the trade union committee, candidates were discussed, and a vote was taken by show of hands. Anybody present had the right to propose a candidate, and the one who was elected was not personally a member of the Party. In considering the claims of the candidates their past activities were discussed, they themselves had to answer questions as to their qualifications, anybody could express an opinion, for or against them, and the basis of all the discussion was: What justification had the candidates to represent their comrades on the local Soviet?
As far as the elections in the villages were concerned, these took place at open village meetings, all peasants of voting age, other than those who employed labour, having the right to vote and to stand for election. As in the towns, any organization or individual could put forward candidates, anyone could ask the candidate questions, and anybody could support or oppose the candidature. It is usual for the Communist Party to put forward a candidate, trade unions and other organizations can also do so, and there is nothing to prevent the Party’s candidate from not being elected, if he has not sufficient prestige among the voters.
The name actually came from British communists that supported the USSR sending tanks into Hungary in '56.
I wouldn’t. I have seen the reasoning for some other bans so I believe that what QSHS said to be the reason or at least part of it, but I don’t know.