Yea. I have tried a few. But they either don’t work for me. Or the come down at the end of the day leaves me unable to do anything.

I don’t think I would even trust an open source version that I fully control. Either it would be a pain in the ass to maintain it or it would eventually have some major vuln discovered and lead to people being hacked. Too risky.

I yearn to go back to the days when a 2 minute lapse in focus/interest didn’t subconsciously send me reaching for my phone.

Can’t wait for adverts for the ass blaster 9000® to be beamed directly into my frontal lobe without my consent.

Someone please correct me if I am wrong. The article does not say where this is happening.

AFAIK these might be illegal in the US but only by technicality since we have laws against flashing lights. Especially ones that could be mistaken for police lights. (yes I know they are box trucks not police cars. But while you are driving and just see the lights in your mirrors you might mistake it for police).

This is basically what I discovered as well. I have found that Ai writes code that is complex and “works” (at least most of the time) but it is heavily over engineered and often contains design choices that make expanding functionality effectively impossible without a full refactor.

When I tried having the Ai fix a test failure the Ai would either fix the code, fix the test, or change the test and the code breaking everything else in the chain.

I no longer use vibe coding because it is just faster/better for me to write the code.

But for tiny scripts it is very good.

Might be easier to come up with a specific name for installing something from Google. “Google loading” maybe.

The we just go back to “installing”.

Is it the bright headlights or the abundance of trucks raised so high that the headlights beam directly into your eyeballs…

Both. It’s both.

Not sure that I would really agree that these are backdoor. Since disabling the vehicle remotely is kinda the express intention of this device. Just a consequence of how they designed them to not be circumvented by the operator.

That is accurate and should absolutely be fought to the end. But the one that this “new” “distro” talks about is specifically the California one.

The law does not require giving the government any access to your system or even sending them any information. This is just false equivalency.

This just seems like an attempt to get sued to challenge the law.

Funny the amount of work that people are putting into such a nothing burger of a law.

Edit: also interesting to see the critical meltdown our community has over a law that doesn’t even require ID verification.

Edit 2: also I will be honest I did not read the entire home page. It is like 5 or 6 times longer than the law that it is complaining about.