Suzerain is phenomenal at this. More story and decision making rather than typical rts/TBS. But really handles a lot of those considerations.

Yes, and they still usually start with voluntary interviews, and if you don’t show up it is recorded that you refused to comply.

The allegations relate to misconduct. While obviously the events occurred, the question is around if they as individuals have any culpability or if it’s purely the company which should carry the liability. If they acted in a reasonable manner in relation to how it unfolded, they would be innocent of misconduct.

If they actively tried to suppress any fixes and took advantage of the CSAM etc to make profit, then they would probably face criminal charges.

The reality likely falls closer to the innocent/minor misconduct.

Usually they always start with voluntary interviews.

And generally if you refuse it doesn’t help you…

They literally were married, and unfortunately he died just in January, but her green card had not yet been issued so she didn’t know what her actual immigration status is.

Read the article.

As another commenter said, Israel is still attacking Lebanon, so, as usual, they ignore any and all ceasefire agreements

Since I’m personally connected, I don’t want to use superlatives. But yes.

While that is true, I think that many of the most successful at building a following are true believers. Hitler is a pretty good example.

I think Mao or Pol Pot also started out quite idealistic and then we’re warped by power.

I suppose it’s very difficult to really say one way or the other, and I would argue that true evil is only possible when the intent is purely self serving.

Even with sociopathy, they may genuinely think they are doing good without feeling empathy for those they harm. However, it’s a very good point that many of those that rise are sociopaths or become sociopathic.

I think that where we are today, it’s more important than ever to really recognise that there is absolutely no “evilest” person. And moreso, almost all of them genuinely believed they were being a force for good.

The main reason for there being no “evilest” is because there are not just tens, or hundreds, but thousands of people who have committed horrific atrocities which even as individual acts would be in contention for the evilest.

Just within the Holocaust, you have so many individuals perpetrating such evil. The croatian fascist groups always stick out in my memory for the raw personal brutality.

However, there are so many comparable situations throughout history that we know very little about. Sacking of cities, mass rapes, Jeffrey fucking epstein, what’s been happening in Sudan, what happened in Ethiopia a few years ago, the Holocaust, the Mongols, the ottomans, the British empire, south American dictators, the Japanese empire, the russian empire, the soviet union, al Qaeda, the Taliban, ISIS, the IRA, the Vikings, and on, and on, and on.

Yes, arguments can be made about how much more evil things are when they are organised etc. However, in my mind, organisation is just a tool that we have improved. We need to be hyper vigilant that anyone, at any time can end up being so radicalised that they are willing to perpetrate evil. Including ourselves. We are not really different from these evil humans.

Henry Kissinger is up there as quite a villain of modern times. Puppet master of most of the fucked up modern world order.

Ottomans were quite vile as well. My grandmother grew up watching ottoman soldiers slicing open pregnant women’s bellies because they were Greek and laughing.

Pol pot is definitely up there.

So many people just have this “oh it was written on the internet, it can’t be illegal”. Mate when you are calling for people to set fire to hotels to burn migrants for their skin colour it’s fucking illegal.

Iran is a completely different beast to Iraq.

🌮🌮🌮🌮🌮🌮🌮🌮🌮

I think they prefer stroopwaffels

Ah yes. That obviously dangerous, terrorist rocket launcher disguised as a… checks notes… Bridge

The term alpine divorce references a book about a murder/suicide/framing plot of a couple going in a mountain holiday. (Check

So the term implies that it is attempted murder.

The article dives into more nuance. The hypothesis being that it could have something to do with instances where men feel more of a need to be able to “complete” the “objective” of the hike, or may go on hikes which are more demanding than their partner may be ready for, or also that they may be ready for.

Similarly, one of the experts in the article goes on to say that this they don’t particularly like making it a gender thing, but unfortunately there is some stark correlation