That does not sound like a charitable interpretation of my argument. For example
A woman in Smolensk was fined for posting a historical photo of her home under Nazi occupation, where a Wehrmacht flag and soldiers appeared in the background.
This has nothing to do with well-defined instances of hate speech. Even the Putin example is quite far fetched, though I guess I should have used a more precise example
That does not sound like a charitable interpretation of my argument. For example
This has nothing to do with well-defined instances of hate speech. Even the Putin example is quite far fetched, though I guess I should have used a more precise example
I mean, if you create any precedent of prosecuting someone over “bad words”, you are fucked long-term
Well, you know, that’s just like uh, your opinion, man
Yep
And also I have to rewatch Lebowski now